Exit, Pursued By History

How Bush treated Clinton and how Obama should handle Bush.

On the face of it, Obama might have less incentive to knock his predecessor off his presidential pedestal. Clinton ended his term with approval ratings in the sixties; even after Marc Rich outrage hardened into a season of Clinton fatigue, the public could compartmentalize tawdry behavior from competent presidential management. Bush, by contrast, is Mephistophelian in his unpopularity. Could some leaked post-inauguration allegation about his leaving the ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

See All Reviews »

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Review

Silhouette_sml
2.8
by James Staley - Jan. 14, 2009

This is a thoughtful op-ed piece. Like most op-eds, it is not well sourced, so evaluation rests on clarity of thought, writing style, cohesion and persuasion of arguments. A little too mean-spirited to persuade me, he did make a solid case that short-memory Americans need to see and be reminded of the Obama/Bush contrast for years to come.

Though generally a forgiving and future-oriented man, Obama would be wise to often contrast his policies and decisions with those of Bush/Cheney. Most Americans have short-memories and a challenged awareness of presidential decisions, policies and legislative initiatives, anyway. Obama's reminding and educating Americans of the Bush/Obama contrasts will not only make the voting populace generally more politically informed but will win him a second term.

(12 answers)

James's Rating

Overall
2.8

Average
from 12 answers
Quality
2.7
Facts
3.0
Fairness
3.0
Information
3.0
Sourcing
2.0
Style
4.0
Context
2.0
Depth
2.0
Enterprise
3.0
Popularity
3.0
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
3.0
More How our ratings work »