How will Roberts Rule on Clean Water?

In the mining case being argued today, the Army Corps of Engineers granted a permit for a gold mine north of Juneau, Alaska, to Coeur Alaska which allows the company to deposit mine tailings into Lower Slate Lake after raising the level of the lake by building a long earthen dam.

Turner writes,

All agree that the tailings, fill or otherwise, would kill nearly all life in the lake. Coeur and the Corps insist that once the ore has been ... Full Story »

Posted by Barry Grossheim
Fabrice Florin
3.8
by Fabrice Florin - Jan. 13, 2009

Informative observations about one long-lasting effect of the Bush presidency, namely the appointment of John Roberts to the Supreme Court. This blog post focuses on how Roberts might rule on environmental issues, such as a mining case being argued today, which the author contrasts with previous associations by John Roberts with the National Mining Association. This analysis provides helpful context based on factual evidence and cites a number of observers to raise reasonable questions about this important issue.

[Disclosure: Beth Wellington is a NewsTrust editor and former staff member]

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Dale Penn
4.2
by Dale Penn - Jan. 13, 2009

This story highlights one of Bush's biggest accomplishments in office, putting in place a neo-conservative Supreme Court Chief Justice, and provides ample cause for concern based on Robert's history. Well written with plenty of links and sources, and a very original angle.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Dwight Rousu
4.3
by Dwight Rousu - Jan. 13, 2009

Roberts' previous legal work to deny citizen legal rights and enable destruction of mountains and communities is well presented. The legacy of any president includes the judicial appointments as a major long lasting effect.

It is time for congress to address legislation that will negate as many of the bad decisions of the court as possible.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Kristin Gorski
4.0
by Kristin Gorski - Jan. 12, 2009

An insightful piece with a unique angle. Bush's judicial appointments will continue to have long-lasting effects as part of his legacy. Looking at environmental problems in Appalachia is like looking at what could happen on other mountain tops and their neighboring populations, both humans and wildlife. Well sourced.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Ann Wilmer
4.7
by Ann Wilmer - Jan. 13, 2009

Well-supported opinion about the Bush legacy with regard to the protection of our environment.

…if the Roberts Court upholds dumping in streams, it will setting a destructive precedent for mountains and for clean water, unless the Obama Administration and ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Rebecca Hale
4.0
by Rebecca Hale - Jan. 13, 2009

Yes, it's an important reminder about why we need to educate ourselves and understand theSupreme Court and our legal system.

I feel that more transparency in reporting about dumping mine waste into streams, such as this blogpost, will help people become involved, and help communities learn to start remediating water and soil, where possible.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Chris Finnie
4.9
by Chris Finnie - Jan. 13, 2009

With two recent coal spills and the Bush legacy discussion in the news, Wellington combines the stories to give us a unique perspective. Everybody seems to agree that history will judge this administration, but this article shows how that history could play out in the long term--and in ways most writers have paid little attention to.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Barry Grossheim
4.3
by Barry Grossheim - Jan. 13, 2009

This is an in dept look at how a current gold mining case before the US Supreme Court might effect mountain top removal coal mining.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Kenneth Sibbett
5.0
by Kenneth Sibbett - Jan. 13, 2009

A very well thought out article on the mind of Roberts. But I believe the out come has been pre-ordained. Even Souter knows that it's 5-4 in a wash.

I Think Obama has come alone at a unique time in our nation's history. I believe he'll be able to appoint two Justices, if age and life expectancy matter, who could completely change the fabic of this nation. Getting the economy back in shape, getting completely out of Iraq, and whatever the hell he can do in Afghanistan is the most important thing on his plate as of now. But if he can manage to change the shape of the Supreme Court, from the very people who stole the election for ... More »

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.3

Good
from 11 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.4
Information
4.4
Insight
4.3
Style
4.0
Context
4.6
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
4.0
Originality
4.5
Relevance
4.4
Popularity
4.2
Recommendation
4.3
Credibility
4.2
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!