Bush's legacy will pin Obama from the start

After Israel's ghastly disproportionate actions in Gaza, it was hardly shocking to read yesterday in the New York Times that our incorrigible ally was ready, willing and eager to preemptively blast Iran last year.

That almost inconceivably nitwitted act appears to have been imminent, for as the Times reported, Israel -- "out of its disbelief and anger at an American intelligence assessment completed in late 2007 that concluded that Iran had ... Full Story »

Posted by Marsha Iverson

See All Reviews »

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Review

Desktop_shot_a_25__thumb
4.3
by Marsha Iverson - Jan. 12, 2009

Strong strategic analysis of the hornets' nest facing Obama in the Middle East in the wake of the Bush foreign policy.

This issue is perhaps the most urgent example of the need for a comprehensive and immediate re-think of "national security" and "global crisis" by the American public. And this is where the news media can make or break our chances of global survival by providing a universal antidote to the likes of Faux News and Right-Wing shout radio.

Oh, and by the way, they added, you wouldn’t mind if we sort of flew over Iraq to get to Iran, would you? As in: That’s not much of a problem, is it? — our carrying bombs over Shiite Iraq, in which you have stationed 140,000 crusading troops, to drop on Shiite Iran? But, as I said, even though the entire idea was almost inconceivable to the rational mind, it was, these days, hardly shocking. Because Israel appears more than ready, willing and eager to further endanger its closest ally’s national security only to protect its own. Exactly why Israel thought that bombing Iran would indeed protect its national security is another story — one as out of touch with global reality as its grossly disproportionate actions in Gaza.

So Obama is left with irony heaped on paradox. His closest ally in the region has shown a boundless capacity to stick its finger in virtually everyone’s eye — our national security be damned — yet his negotiating maneuverability with Iran is lethally constrained by domestic political pressures.

(15 answers)

Marsha's Rating

Overall
4.3

Good
from 15 answers
Quality
4.4
Information
5.0
Insight
5.0
Style
4.0
Context
4.0
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
3.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
5.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
3.0
More How our ratings work »