President works to defend his legacy

The countdown clocks that George Bush's chief of staff distributed 990 days ago are still ticking. His advisers tallied their remaining time last week and calculated fewer than 300 hours to go.

Cardboard cartons are stacked in the West Wing as files are carefully catalogued for the archives. By Friday, the last official work day of the Bush White House, all but the most senior officials will have turned in their government-issued BlackBerrys and ... Full Story »

Posted by Fabrice Florin

See All Reviews »

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Review

N1291308116_4139_thumb
3.4
by Vincent Caminiti - Jan. 12, 2009

The story delivered on the title. It was also notable that the editor didn't muck it up with a sensational adjectives like most of the major media sources have opted. It's always refreshing to see American news written by non-Americans for non-American markets. in this case the reader got glimpse of the reality that exists inside the Bush team, whereby they do actions that are clearly a defensive strategy (as it relates to the legacy) however their rhetoric spills with confidence about their accomplishments. No child left behind has many more victims than celebrants yet - the four words seem to evoke a cheer. It appears that this article, without being snarky, managed to demonstrate its points without turning it into a stink bomb.

This legacy nonsense is a domestic issue with many layers and many breach points considering that President Bush has presided over the worst economy since the 30s and is highly likely to have pushed the nation into a nose dive as he concentrated the efforts of failed Reagonomics beyond a Corporatist's wildest dreams. Congress, likewise, gets to share the legacy and it's grim reminders of the company store. And we Americans get reminder to be a responsible electorate, although we probably could have accomplished this awareness at a much cheaper price if we were as conscientious as thinkers as we are as consumers.

(13 answers)

Vincent's Rating

Overall
3.4

Average
from 13 answers
Quality
3.5
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
3.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
5.0
Context
3.0
Depth
2.0
Enterprise
3.0
Popularity
3.0
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
3.0
More How our ratings work »