Poll: Fair to speculate on Bush's legacy?

When the emotions surrounding Bush have faded and it comes time to evaluate him purely on his merits and historical context, it will still be hard to think of any mitigating factors that could whitewash his well-known failures (and I'm sure you thought of more than a few without my having to provide examples). Indeed, it may be indicative of Bush's eventual legacy that much of the current speculation over it has just as much to do with whether it's fair to ... Full Story »

Posted by Marsha Iverson
Tags Help
Subjects: Politics, Other, U.S.
Member Tags: Bush, legacy
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Marsha Iverson - Jan 9, 2009 - 7:05 PM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Marsha Iverson - Jan 9, 2009 - 7:05 PM PST

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Mmonday_thumb
3.2
by Mark Monday - Jan. 12, 2009

This is hardly journalism -- it is a blog. It is an interesting blog, filled with personal opinion and well worth reading. However there is no real attempt to explain anything to the reader; on the contrary the purpose is to solicit to viewpoint from the reader. This is chumming bait when fishing -- interesting infotainment, but not solid journalism

See Full Review » (19 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
1.6
by Dwight Rousu - Jan. 12, 2009

It is a little reader poll; too simple, and statistically invalid because respondents are self selected, not random.

I voted with the 80% who said it was fair to speculate on his legacy because his policies have been one failure after another.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Desktop_shot_a_25__thumb
3.4
by Marsha Iverson - Jan. 9, 2009

Interesting question posed to Southern California readers in the LA Times Opinion section. The jury is out, but presumably the results will be available soon.

Good question, limited range of replies and no tally.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.4
by Fabrice Florin - Jan. 9, 2009
See Full Review » (10 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

2.9

Average
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
2.8
Facts
3.0
Fairness
2.8
Information
2.8
Insight
3.0
Sourcing
2.2
Style
3.2
Accuracy
3.0
Balance
3.0
Context
3.0
Depth
2.2
Enterprise
3.0
Expertise
3.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.0
Transparency
3.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
3.2
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
3.5
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!