We Arm the World

In 2007, U.S. foreign military sales agreements totaled more than $32 billion — nearly triple the amount during President Bush’s first full year in office.

The Pentagon routinely justifies weapons sales as “promoting regional stability,” but many of these arms end up in the world’s war zones. In 2006 and 2007, the five biggest recipients of U.S. weapons were Pakistan ($3.5 billion), Iraq ($2.2 billion), Israel ($2.2 billion), Afghanistan ... Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu

See All Reviews »

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Review

Me234g_014_thumb
4.3
by John Gillette - Jan. 5, 2009

Although filtered through the New American ideals of the democratic platform, this article provides a critical stance on America's role as war service provider for conflicts around the globe by profiting from an industry of producing weaponry.

When the majority of our tax revenue scaffolds the military industrial complex which imposes certain global geopolitical visions, it is fruitless to question other political groups' motives for wanting to have their own control over the earth's resources.

(7 answers)

John's Rating

Overall
4.3

Good
from 7 answers
Quality
4.4
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
5.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
3.0
More How our ratings work »