Bonfire of profanities

Today we are going to deal with the media coverage of profanities, expletives, vulgarisms, obscenities, execrations, and epithets, nouns often lumped together by the Bluenose Generation as coarseness, crudeness, bawdiness, scatology or swearing. But roundheeled readers should stop rubbing their hands because the deliberately shocking subject can be treated with decorum, in plain words, without the titillating examples of "dirty words."

If you want ... Full Story »

Posted by Leo Romero
Tags Help
Subjects: Media, Education
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Leo Romero - Jan 4, 2009 - 10:06 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Jan 4, 2009 - 1:30 PM PST

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
3.9
by Kaizar Campwala - Jan. 4, 2009

Fun, educational read, but not particularly news worthy.

See Full Review » (8 answers)
N779153898_2868_thumb
4.0
by James Jackson - Jan. 4, 2009

Not all journalism is news. The purpose of ed-op is to clarify issues or to plead a case. Mr. Safire always stimulates thought and often a smile.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.0
by Leo Romero - Jan. 4, 2009
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.5
by Fabrice Florin - Jan. 4, 2009
See Full Review » (2 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
1.9
by Dwight Rousu - Jan. 6, 2009

Minor linguistic entertainment.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Silhouette_sml
2.8
by George Blahusiak - Jan. 4, 2009

Interesting article. I think however it missed the principal point. During my time at university our English Lit prof told us that there are 30,000 or so words in the language. If we can't express ourselves without profanity then our knowledge of the language is pretty poor indeed. Mind you, even Bill the Bard (William Shakespeare to those who don't know him all that well) occasionally used rough language. Still, he knew most of the other words too, and used them well so that his use ... More »

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Download_thumb
4.2
by Kenneth Sibbett - Jan. 4, 2009

Safire, you're a F#!%^$g Idiot.Who the F*#k do you think you are, a F#@&k#@g librarian. Mind your own G#@*#*@m business. I'll write any G#@*%!$!m way i feel like .

To the people of Newstrust, I'm as sorry as S#&t about the above F#%@*%# report.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.3

Average
from 7 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.3
Information
3.3
Insight
3.2
Style
4.0
Context
3.6
Enterprise
2.5
Expertise
3.0
Originality
3.7
Relevance
1.7
Popularity
3.3
Recommendation
3.2
Credibility
3.3
# Reviews
3.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!