Adding more U.S. troops to the Afghanistan mess is a bad idea

We should not underestimate the strength of nationalism in Afghanistan and Pakistan, particularly among the 40 million Pashtuns who live on both sides of the border there. It's difficult to see why adding 40,000 more U.S. troops to the area will stabilize the situation. Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu - via AllTop
Tags Help
Subjects: World
Topics: Afghanistan
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - Oct 22, 2009 - 6:41 PM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dwight Rousu - Oct 23, 2009 - 4:27 PM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
3.6
by Dwight Rousu - Oct. 23, 2009

Kristof puts forward many of the right questions about the hawk gung ho escalation plans.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.1
by Tanya J. Maurer - Oct. 26, 2009
See Full Review » (11 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.8
by Randy Morrow - Oct. 25, 2009
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.7
by James Canning - Oct. 24, 2009

Good advice for Obama, as to merits of not pouring more US troops into Afghanistan.

Adding gasoline to the fire is a good analogy used by Kristof. The Afghan president says putting in more US troops will not imrprove security. ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

Good
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
4.1
Information
3.5
Insight
4.5
Style
4.0
Context
4.0
Expertise
3.3
Originality
3.7
Relevance
4.3
Responsibility
4.7
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
4.2
Credibility
3.2
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!