Did Financial Rules Mandate a Meltdown?

() A libertarian look at the current pay kerfuffle for financial services companies suggests regulating executive compensation will not produce healthier capitalism. Full Story »

Posted by J Sinclaire - via Miller-McCune

See All Reviews »

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Review

Silhouette_sml
4.6
by J Sinclaire - Oct. 23, 2009

An interesting look at the libertarian political philosopher Jeffrey Friedman's take on who caused the financial meltdown (hint: government). I disagree with most of the things he states, for the same reason I disagree with most libertarians. The theories they spout make sense but only if you don't take reality into the equation. They base assumptions on a world I don't think really exists, because they only look at a small part of an issue and stop there. However, it's an interesting read and I agree about the unintended consequences of government regulation. However, unintended consequences are a part of all aspects of life, including capitalism and business, as we have learned so well in the last 2 years. Unintended consequences are a given, and not a reason not to regulate.

(6 answers)

J's Rating

Overall
4.6

Very good
from 6 answers
Quality
4.5
Information
5.0
Insight
4.0
Expertise
4.0
Popularity
5.0
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
5.0
More How our ratings work »