There’s No Substitute for Troops on the Ground

New York Times by Max Boot | Oct. 22, 2009 (Opinion)

After a visit to Afghanistan, it was clear that success there depends on an infusion of additional troops. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala - via NewsRack (Afghanistan), AllTop, New York Times (Opinion), Opinion Source

More Info

Tags Help
Subjects: World
Topics: War, Afghanistan, Taliban
Member Tags: united states defense and military forces, afghanistan war (2001- ), AL QAEDA
Editorial Help
Posted by: via New York Times - Oct 21, 2009 - 9:55 PM PDT
Reviewed by: Ben Ross (review)
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Like | | | Comments

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
N638965977_3994_thumb
1.6
 by Ben Ross - Oct. 23, 2009

Opinion piece...sees aggressive war as part of an answer. Completely miss the elements of international law. Myopy.

As a thinking person ..I would not want my country invaded .....

See Full Review » (5 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

Sort by: Oldest | Newest Hide All Replies
NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

1.6

not enough reviews
from 1 review (14% confidence)
Quality
1.7
Information
1.0
Insight
2.0
Popularity
1.1
Recommendation
1.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

World | War | Afghanistan | Taliban
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!