The three fallacies that have driven the war in Afghanistan

A bloody escalation in the war is more likely to fuel jihadism than thwart it. If Obama is serious about undermining this vile fanatical movement, it would be much wiser to take the hundreds of billions he is currently squandering on chasing after a hundred fighters in the Afghan mountains and redeploy it. Spend it instead on beefing up policing and intelligence, and on building a network of schools across Pakistan and other flash-points in the Muslim ... Full Story »

Posted by Chris Finnie
Tags Help
Subjects: World
Stats Help
# Diggs: 5 (as of 2009-10-21)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Chris Finnie - Oct 21, 2009 - 7:15 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Chris Finnie - Oct 21, 2009 - 7:17 AM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
4.4
by Chris Finnie - Oct. 21, 2009

A bleak, but convincing argument about our options in Afghanistan. Hari uses the words of U.S. generals to good effect to bolster his argument.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Mindy_avatar_photo_-_radioteocelot-shirt_thumb
4.4
by Mindy Phypers - Oct. 22, 2009
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.8
by Randy Morrow - Oct. 22, 2009
See Full Review » (10 answers)
P9110066_thumb
4.2
by Patricia Blochowiak - Oct. 21, 2009

". . . and they think they'll put an end to war this way."

See Full Review » (18 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.7
by James Canning - Oct. 21, 2009

Excellent partial explanation for the reasons putting in more US troops will only increase chances of failure in Afghanistan.

Obama should be thinking about how best to allow India, Iran, China, Russia, and other countries in the vicinity of Afghanistan, work out a means of ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
5.0
by Jason Slade - Oct. 21, 2009
See Full Review » (3 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.3

Good
from 6 reviews (53% confidence)
Quality
4.3
Facts
4.0
Fairness
2.0
Information
4.2
Insight
4.5
Style
4.8
Accuracy
3.0
Balance
3.0
Context
4.2
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
4.2
Originality
3.8
Relevance
4.5
Transparency
3.0
Responsibility
4.2
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.7
Credibility
3.6
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!