When the warmest year in history isn't

When it comes to global warming, newspapers play up stories that reinforce the prevalent the-sky-is-falling belief that global warming is human-caused and catastrophic. But if a study or scientist does not portend the end of the world as we know it, it rarely rates as news.

In that spirit, many papers (including The Chronicle) have reported on a UC San Diego science historian who reviewed 928 abstracts of peer-reviewed articles on global warming ... Full Story »

Posted by Fabrice Florin

See All Reviews »

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Review

Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.8
by Fabrice Florin - Dec. 1, 2008

Insightful opinion about controversies surrounding climate change. The author suggests that scientists and the news media tend to favor the orthodox view that global warming is man-made -- and downplay findings from scientists that defy this position, even when they have reasonable evidence to back their claims. The author presents a fair and thoughtful argument, and cites credible experts and factual to support her points. A very worthwhile read.

I have generally supported a pro-active approach to addressing climate change issues while we can, as common sense suggests it's better to be safe than sorry. However, I am well aware that this is a very complex issue, which will take a long time to fully understand, and am cautious about forming definitive conclusions without sufficient data, particularly predictions based on notoriously unreliable computer models. It also appears that there has been an unfair backlash against some dissenting but thoughtful voices on this topic in recent years -- and I welcome reasonable discussions based on sound research. It usually pays off to keep an open mind about complex phenomena like these, in my experience.

(12 answers)

Fabrice's Rating

Overall
3.8

Good
from 12 answers
Quality
3.8
Information
4.0
Insight
4.0
Style
3.0
Context
4.0
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
4.0
Originality
3.0
Relevance
4.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »