Americans' Food Stamp Use Nears All-Time High

Fueled by rising unemployment and food prices, the number of Americans on food stamps is poised to exceed 30 million for the first time this month, surpassing the historic high set in 2005 after Hurricane Katrina.

The figures will put the spotlight on hunger when Congress begins deliberations on a new economic stimulus package, said legislators and anti-hunger advocates, predicting that any stimulus bill will include a boost in food stamp ... Full Story »

Posted by Michael Bugeja
Tags Help
Subjects: Living, World, U.S., Business
Topics: Food, Hunger, Poverty, Jobs
Member Tags: unemployment
Editorial Help

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Silhouette_sml
4.7
by Martha Rosler - Nov. 26, 2008

it provides a succinct rundown on the great jump in hunger, or 'food insecurity' in the US in light of current economic conditions and the growing need for food assistance and the inability of the food stamp and charity programs to satisfy the demand.

Need a national mobilization alongside a government commitment to 'bailing out' the poor residents alongside the rich institutions.

See Full Review » (15 answers)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.8
by Fabrice Florin - Nov. 26, 2008

Informative report about the recent increase in the number of Americans using food stamps -- and the potential rise in hunger in coming months. This article provides a great factual overview of the crisis facing the nation, as well as the various government and charitable programs that attempt to address that issue. The author interviews a variety of credible sources to present different perspectives on this important topic.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.3
by Kaizar Campwala - Nov. 26, 2008

Excellent journalism. Great sourcing in a story that effectively zooms out from the local to a macro-economic perspective.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.2
by Michael Bugeja - Nov. 26, 2008

This feature story on Food Stamps could have read like a government news release, but reporter Jane Black's sourcing highlights the nuances of quality journalism. For instance, she not only interviews officials and archives facts and past actions; she interviews people applying for food stamps. She forecasts a USDA report on numbers approaching 30 million on food aid, careful to note how many are children and foreshadowing her last paragraph about the WIC program that helps infants ... More »

After almost 20 years working in Appalachia, and seeing hunger in children weekly, I can attest that the food stamp program is an essential ... More »

To qualify for the food stamp program, whose name was officially changed last month to the Simplified Nutrition Assistance Program, recipients must have an income below 130 ... More »

See Full Review » (22 answers)
N1812091_2834_thumb
4.3
by Derek Hawkins - Nov. 26, 2008
See Full Review » (10 answers)
N628474479_7734_thumb
4.2
by Joel Kulenkamp - Nov. 26, 2008
See Full Review » (5 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.0
by George Blahusiak - Nov. 26, 2008

Good story but could have done wih more long term analysis too. eg, food stamp usage as compared to, say, Great Depresion (yeah, I know ther weren't food stamps then, but you know)

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Untitled_thumb
3.6
by Kevin Barry - Nov. 26, 2008
See Full Review » (6 answers)
Download_thumb
5.0
by Kenneth Sibbett - Nov. 27, 2008

Very statictical journalism. The writer hit all bases, from the elderly to young.

The line around the church was wrapped around poles that police Officers had erected at 8:00 A.M. By 12:00 P.M. the lines were still there, but the ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
7188bloom-2_thumb
5.0
by Pamela Austin - Nov. 26, 2008
See Full Review » (5 answers)
Silhouette_sml
5.0
by Matt LaMartina - Nov. 26, 2008
See Full Review » (5 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.3

Good
from 11 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.3
Facts
4.2
Fairness
4.2
Information
4.4
Insight
4.0
Sourcing
4.6
Style
4.4
Accuracy
4.5
Balance
4.0
Context
4.2
Depth
3.8
Enterprise
3.5
Expertise
4.5
Originality
4.0
Relevance
5.0
Transparency
4.5
Responsibility
5.0
Popularity
4.2
Recommendation
4.4
Credibility
4.3
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

(See these related stories.)

Links Help