Gulf War illness is real, report finds

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A report released on Monday concluded that Gulf War syndrome is a legitimate illness suffered by more than 175,000 U.S. war veterans who were exposed to chemical toxins in the 1991 Gulf War. Full Story »

Posted by Glenn LaBauve
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S.
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Glenn LaBauve - Nov 18, 2008 - 10:35 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Glenn LaBauve - Nov 18, 2008 - 10:35 AM PST

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
4.0
by Walter Cox - Nov. 18, 2008

This article is all good and well, just very LATE!!! By the time Clinton took his oath of office in 1992, all the facts were known--veterans were sick, and dying, by the thousands. Yet military leaders--who knew the most, especially about troop exposure to sarin gas after we bombed Saddam's weapons depot at Khamisayeh--were under strict gag order. And rather than treating the injured veterans, they were told their problems were in their heads and prescribed huge doses of Prozac . ... More »

Obviously this topic enrages me; even the above "review" is a rant! I wrote extensively about the topic TEN YEARS AGO!!! Clinton did NOTHING!! ... More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Dscf2146_thumb
4.3
by Glenn LaBauve - Nov. 18, 2008

Bringing to light the secrets of the first Bush administration has only taken 17 years in this case, much like the atomic veterans, hepatitis C victims and agent orange veterans. Only by contiueing to bring these horrors to the public can they ever be corrected and compensated for.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.4
by Dennis A. Abbott - Nov. 18, 2008

17 years later, and after about 6 years of study, the truth emerges. This is important news, told clearly.

Some stories demand a measure of finger-pointing. It's missing here, as if restraint meant fair and balanced.

See Full Review » (8 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.9
by Randy Morrow - Nov. 19, 2008
See Full Review » (10 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.1

Good
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
4.1
Facts
4.5
Fairness
4.2
Information
4.2
Sourcing
4.0
Style
3.7
Context
4.0
Depth
3.3
Enterprise
3.7
Popularity
4.1
Recommendation
4.5
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!