Experts clash on gays' bids to adopt children

Dueling social-science testimony marked a trial over a gay North Miami man's petition to adopt his two foster children.

The judge's ruling will determine whether a 4-year-old boy and his 8-year-old brother can be adopted by Frank Gill, the North Miami foster parent who has raised the boys for four years, and his partner. Lederman said she will decide on the adoption later this month.

Florida is the only state that bans all gay people from adopting. This fall, a Circuit Court judge in Key West declared Florida's ban unconstitutional, although the decision is ... Full Story »

Posted by Dale Penn

See All Reviews »

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Review

Member_photo_thumb
4.3
by Michael Bugeja - Nov. 18, 2008

This enterprising reporter secures transcripts of a case in which gay foster parents want to adopt children but cannot, in that Florida law bans gays from adoption (although allows it for felons and drug abusers). While the topic is gay adoption rights, the theme is social science--which stands this report above others in that its in-depth look at the topic also does so from that perspective. The story hinges on testimony by two professors for the state: George A. Rekers, a retired professor from the University of South Carolina, who taught neuropsychiatry and behavioral science, and Walter R. Schumm, an assistant professor of family studies at Kansas State University. Other academics respond to their belief that children of gays are "at greater risk of developing a host of impairments that can harm children, such as mental illness, alcohol or drug abuse, and the virus that causes AIDS." Fred S. Berlin, an associate professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, criticized Rekers' work, noting Rekers also has a theology degree. As NewsTrust viewers will see, this report captures key debates of our times associated with gay rights and accountable science.

As a foster parent who adopted, I can attest that placement should be based on a case-by-case basis rather than on a cluster basis, especially when the latter focuses on the socially disenfranchised, for their psychological attributes may differ because of injustice rather than lifestyle or other stereotypical deduction on the part of critics.

Under cross-examination, Rekers, who also has a theology degree, acknowledged that he taught and practiced psychology from a Christian perspective, and had written books condemning social science that doesn’t recognize ``the moral laws of God.’’

Religion and science don’t mix, as we have seen in debates about intelligent design, in as much as religion uses deductive logic whereas science uses inductive reasoning. Same debates and flawed arguments exist concerning issues involving religion and social science. Inductive reasoning has proved for valid and replicable.

(22 answers)

Michael's Rating

Overall
4.3

Good
from 22 answers
Quality
4.2
Facts
4.0
Fairness
5.0
Information
5.0
Insight
4.0
Sourcing
3.0
Style
4.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
4.0
Depth
5.0
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
4.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.0
Transparency
4.0
Responsibility
5.0
Popularity
4.5
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »