Bailout to Nowhere

New York Times - by David Brooks - Nov. 16, 2008 (Opinion)
Democrats from Barack Obama to Nancy Pelosi want to grant immortality to General Motors, Chrysler and Ford. They have decided to follow an earlier $25 billion loan with a $50 billion bailout, which would inevitably be followed by more billions later, because if these companies are not permitted to go bankrupt now, they never will be.

This is a different sort of endeavor than the $750 billion bailout of Wall Street. That money was used to save the ... More »
Review | Like | Submitted by Fabrice Florin
Featured Reviews
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.8
by Fabrice Florin - Nov. 16, 2008 - See Full Review (12 answers)
Notes: Insightful opinion about the proposed $50 billion government bailout of Detroit's big three automakers, supported by Obama and Democrats. The author argues against such a major investment in General Motors, Chrysler and Ford, because of their history of management blunders and miscalculations. This article is thoughtful and makes a reasonable case that this is a questionable use of federal funds. He also suggests that this political decision may be partly influenced by lobbying from ... More »
Comment: The author's points are reasonable -- why bail out a poorly managed auto industry, instead of investing these funds to support more important or ... More »
Fabrice submitted this story.

Member_photo_thumb
3.6
by Kaizar Campwala - Nov. 16, 2008 - See Full Review (12 answers)
Notes: Brooks makes some solid points in the piece decrying a bailout of the auto industry. He fails to tell readers what a failure of the big three would mean for the American economy in the short and medium term, however.

Member_photo_thumb
4.2
by James Jackson - Nov. 16, 2008 - See Full Review (11 answers)
Notes: I often disagree with David Brooks, but I usually learn something by reading his column. This column explores the hazards of government granting immorality to corporations.

Silhoutte_sml
4.0
by Randy Morrow - Nov. 17, 2008 - See Full Review (11 answers)
Notes: A question this article does not address is if we let the "big 3" go how will that effect the manufacturing ability/base of this country?

More Reviews
Member_photo_thumb
3.3
by Leo Romero - Nov. 16, 2008 - See Full Review (18 answers)
Quote: It is all a reminder that the biggest threat to a healthy economy is not the socialists of campaign lore. It’s C.E.O.’s. It’s politically powerful crony capitalists ... More »

Quotes Help
Leo Romero shared this quote: (See Full Review)

It is all a reminder that the biggest threat to a healthy economy is not the socialists of campaign lore. It’s C.E.O.’s. It’s politically powerful crony capitalists who use their influence to create a stagnant corporate welfare state.

In short, a bailout will not solve anything — just postpone things. If this goes through, Big Three executives will make decisions knowing that whatever happens, Uncle Sam will bail them out — just like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In the meantime, capital that could have gone to successful companies and programs will be directed toward companies with a history of using it badly.

But the larger principle is over the nature of America’s political system. Is this country going to slide into progressive corporatism, a merger of corporate and federal power that will inevitably stifle competition, empower corporate and federal bureaucrats and protect entrenched interests? Or is the U.S. going to stick with its historic model: Helping workers weather the storms of a dynamic economy, but preserving the dynamism that is the core of the country’s success.

Comments
The author's points are reasonable -- why bail out a poorly managed auto industry, instead of investing these funds to support more important or viable sectors of the economy? Though I believe that Obama has proposed a 'conditional' investment, which could require the automakers to invest this capital to develop more energy-efficient vehicles and green technology.
Tools

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:


(Beta) Ratings
Our Rating
3.7
(very good)
5 reviews

Quality
3.7

Accuracy
3.0

Balance
3.0

Context
3.4

Depth
3.0

Enterprise
2.8

Expertise
2.6

Facts
3.0

Fairness
4.0

Information
3.6

Insight
4.2

Originality
3.6

Relevance
4.6

Style
4.0

Transparency
2.0

Responsibility
4.0

Popularity
3.8

Recommendation
4.0

Credibility
4.0

# Reviews
2.5

# Views
5.0

# Likes
1.0

# Emails
1.0


How our ratings work