Picking Obama's team: Balancing smart retreads with fresh faces

International Herald Tribune, Bloomberg by Albert R. Hunt | Nov. 16, 2008 (Opinion)

Barack Obama has had an almost perfect two weeks. He will make mistakes in the transition; everyone does. He especially needs to walk a delicate line as he forms a new government.

Since Nov. 4, though, his tone, balance, appointments, priorities and few policy actions have been on key. Small missteps, such as a careless remark abut Nancy Reagan, were rectified immediately.

It is striking how well prepared this political newcomer is. What ... Full Story »

Posted by Leo Romero

More Info

Tags Help
Subjects: Politics, U.S.
Topics: Obama Administration
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Leo Romero - Nov 16, 2008 - 8:55 AM PST
Reviewed by: Leo Romero (review), Kaizar Campwala (review), Kenneth Sibbett (review), Phyllis Florin (review)
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Leo Romero - Nov 16, 2008 - 8:55 AM PST
Like | | | Comments

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
3.8
 by Kaizar Campwala - Nov. 16, 2008

Though it started out sounding like yet another fawning endorsement of Obama's victory, this opinion piece ended up offering some solid analysis of the appointment choices he faces, with good information and even-handed consideration.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.0
 by Phyllis Florin - Nov. 16, 2008
See Full Review » (5 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.0
 by Leo Romero - Nov. 16, 2008
Leo posted this story.
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Download_thumb
2.5
 by Kenneth Sibbett - Nov. 16, 2008

If you agree with the writer it's good journalism.

Barah Obama seems to me is running one of the smoothest transitions iv'e ever witnessed. Not only is he showing strength, but a soft hand behind ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

Sort by: Oldest | Newest Hide All Replies
NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.4

Average
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
3.4
Information
5.0
Insight
3.3
Style
3.7
Context
3.7
Enterprise
2.0
Expertise
2.0
Originality
3.0
Relevance
4.0
Popularity
3.3
Recommendation
3.3
Credibility
3.5
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!