Obama's chance to end the fantasy that is Star Wars

The US has spent $160bn – only to increase the danger to itself and the rest of us

Sure, maybe one day scientists will discover some way to evaporate nukes in the brief window before they strike. Maybe they will discover how to turn lead into gold – a pursuit that obsessed Europe's best minds for centuries. Maybe aliens will get in touch. But none of these assumptions is a sensible basis for government policy. Full Story »

Posted by Chris Finnie

See All Reviews »

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Review

Member_photo_thumb
4.7
by Chris Finnie - Nov. 13, 2008

Everybody seems to have advice for the incoming administration. Here's one more. With a lot of detail, it makes a good case for the proposal. However, Hari fails to note that a U.S. general in charge of this program has lately been telling the press we've been making technical advancements and it's important to continue the program. The reports I've read of his comments, however, fail to list the costs--both financial and diplomatic--that Hari does. And, as far as I know, Hari is right about the effectiveness of the system.

I know a physicist and engineer who worked on this project in the Reagan years. Both agree it will never and can never work. They called it "fatally flawed" scientifically and technically. The physicist explained it much the way Hari does, as a bullet hitting another bullet, but then went on to prove to me why it couldn't work. Considering this, and the current deficit, I have to agree with Hari.

(12 answers)

Chris's Rating

Overall
4.7

Very good
from 12 answers
Quality
4.9
Information
4.0
Insight
5.0
Style
5.0
Context
5.0
Enterprise
5.0
Originality
5.0
Relevance
5.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »