Experts are not cited, but with the security levels of protection built up around this farce, it is very very hard to get experts on the record. Hari describes the situation fairly accurately, though not at a high-tech level. Hari identifies that the project is destabilizing and needs priority attention.

Everybody seems to have advice for the incoming administration. Here's one more. With a lot of detail, it makes a good case for the proposal. However, Hari fails to note that a U.S. general in charge of this program has lately been telling the press we've been making technical advancements and it's important to continue the program. The reports I've read of his comments, however, fail to list the costs--both financial and diplomatic--that Hari does. And, as far as I know, Hari is ... More »

THIS IS HIGHLY BIASED LEFTWING REPORTING. THIS MAN SHOULD BE WRITING FOR THE PROPAGANDA ARM OF THE CHINEESE, RUSSIAN ,IRIANIAN GOVERNMENTS. THIS ARTICLE SHOWS VERY LIMITED UNDERSTANDING OF DEFENCE ISSUES. HE IS THE TYPICAL REAGAN HATER . GET A NEW REPORTER.