President-elect Barack Obama, in one of the first policy statements of his transition, demanded that the Bush administration either submit the proposed U.S.-Iraq “status-of-forces agreement” to Congress or leave an opening for him to change it next year. Full Story »
Posted by Dwight Rousu
To:
Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.
Note:
Factual summary of Obama’s position on the future of U.S. troops in Iraq. Story points out some major differences on how Obama will handle the situation differently from Bush including using recommendations made in a bipartisan study that were ignored for the last 2 years. Article provides context on how the results of the election are impacting the negotiations of the pact with the Iraqis. Provides a brief summary on congressional funding of the war and what may occur next ... More »
It will be interesting to see if the recommendations made in studies that were ignored for two years will be helpful in Iraq. I am happy to read ... More »
“It is unacceptable that the Iraqi government will present the agreement to the Iraqi parliament for approval — yet the Bush administration will not do the same with ... More »
It is interesting (especially given Obama's first post election news conference) that the MSM media has said absolutely nothing about this policy statement.
The article reports the Obama statements and includes a relatively thorough evaluation of impacts and reactions.
I love this report. Bring attention to the President elects web site and demand to bring the congress back into the decision making process concerning ' the proposed U.S.-Iraq “status-of-forces agreement”'
best news yet about the new pres. I wonder if the rest of the media has reported....the transition web site.. www.change.gov,mngoing to check now!
Retrieving Comments
