This story accurately reports how the McCain campaign completely ignored publicly available information about their opponent. When they discovered their oversight, they tried to blame their incompetence on the media, implying that the information was suppressed. The story makes clear that the interview was not just available but actively promoted by the paper.

Informative report that debunks false claims by Sarah Palin that the SF Chronicle hid allegedgly disparaging comments by Obama about the coal industry. The article provides solid factual evidence that prove these claims to be false. However, it would have been helpful to provide additional sources and perspectives on this topic, given the conflict of interest in reporting a story that involves your own publication. Good reporting nonetheless.

The Chronicle defends itself by pointing out that both audio and visual recordings of the interview have been on their web site since the interview took place and have been advertised heavily. Pretty easy defense against what appears to be a campaign grasping at straws.

Its a rather brief account of important News about a Presidential Candidate. Not much of a journalistic report however.

This story is a bit self-serving, in that it seeks to defend the paper from complaints . It provides links to its video and audio of the interview in question, but no transcript. Under related story, see that Jake Tapper has provided a seemingly complete transcript to the section of the speech in question, although I would have found a complete transcript by the Chronicle to be the most helpful.