Last of the Culture Warriors

Why has America turned on Sarah Palin? Obviously, her wobbly television interviews haven't helped. Nor have the drip, drip of scandals from Alaska, which have tarnished her reformist image. But Palin's problems run deeper, and they say something fundamental about the political age being born. Palin's brand is culture war, and in America today culture war no longer sells. The struggle that began in the 1960s -- which put questions of racial, sexual and ... Full Story »

Posted by Fabrice Florin
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Fabrice Florin - Nov 3, 2008 - 1:38 PM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

New_headshot_thumb
3.0
by Dan Kennedy - Nov. 4, 2008

Beinart argues that Sarah Palin represents the end of an era, as the culture wars of the past generation have become passé. But as he concedes, that's largely because of economic woes, which may or may not last. He makes some good points, but it's too facile to suggest that what may be a passing moment represents real generational change.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.6
by Fabrice Florin - Nov. 3, 2008

Thoughtful column by Peter Beinart, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, who makes a good argument that the culture wars characterized by Sarah Palin's confrontational style of politics may be coming to an end. The author presents reasonable evidence in a logical way to suggest that these cultural feuds may no longer be relevant to Americans who came of age after the civil rights, gay rights and feminist revolutions -- and even less relevant in the middle of the ... More »

After reading some of the other reviews on this story, I took a step back to re-examine my own review, and adjusted my rating down a bit. Perhaps my ... More »

Palin’s attacks are also failing because of generational change. The long-running, internecine baby boomer cultural feud just isn’t that relevant to Americans ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.0
by Kaizar Campwala - Nov. 3, 2008

The history lesson we get about the relationship between generational changes, economic security and culture wars was excellent. Worth the read.

I'm not sure if I agree with the predictions at the end of the piece about the near term direction of the Republican party. But time will tell.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.5
by Michael Bugeja - Nov. 4, 2008

Huffington Post readers are familiar with this type of attempt to set the media agenda. (Read a 2006 post, "Peter Beinhart Has No Clothes," by David Sirota.) For all its studied eloquence, this predictable Beinhart piece is one more misargued example by a journalist-pundit accustomed to framing the news before it becomes news. Quite simply, Beinhart as a Yale-educated foreign relations expert and liberal hawk for war in Iraq has forgotten his Americana, beginning with Annie Oakley. ... More »

Michael Russnow in the Huffington Post explains why media promote Sarah Palin in his essay "Annie Oakley is Running for National Office." I'll also ... More »

Although she seems like a fresh face, Sarah Palin actually represents the end of an era. More »

See Full Review » (21 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
2.7
by Chris Finnie - Nov. 4, 2008

As a former history major, it seems that saying the culture war "died" is exaggerated. Mutated maybe. Shifted certainly. But I live in a state where gay marriage could be banned today, with polling currently too close to call. And the third attempt to legislate parental notification for abortion just might pass--in a state considered one of the most liberal in the country. So Beinart's predictions seem premature to me--no matter what the polls say.

While I agree with his characterization of Palin's attacks, they do still resonate with a fairly large portion of the electorate. Otherwise ... More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.4

Average
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.3
Facts
3.0
Fairness
3.0
Information
3.2
Insight
3.6
Style
3.8
Accuracy
3.0
Balance
3.0
Context
3.6
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
2.8
Expertise
2.5
Originality
3.5
Relevance
3.0
Transparency
3.0
Responsibility
3.0
Popularity
3.5
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
4.2
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »