A Volley Between Fox News and Obama Administration

A presidential spokeswoman said, “We don’t need to pretend that this is the way that legitimate news organizations behave.” Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala - via OneRiot, Jeff Jarvis, Dan Kennedy, Google News (U.S.), New York Times (Most Emailed), Tom Friedman
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: via Dan Kennedy - Oct 11, 2009 - 8:14 PM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Oct 12, 2009 - 9:33 AM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
3.2
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 12, 2009

This Times could have made this a good piece, by taking the time to provide some kind of objective data on how Fox News has covered the administration, vis a vi other television news organizations. But it instead substituted a he-said, she-said approach which is neither insightful or informative.

Mr. Beck, whose 5 p.m. program consistently draws three million viewers, is a “cultural phenomenon now,” Mr. Shine said. But this success has come at a price: he is the ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Christoph_wienands_thumb
4.1
by Christoph Wienands - Oct. 12, 2009

The author examines an escalating verbal battle between the White House and Fox. Not only do both sides bring their arguments, the author also looks at potential reasons why both sides might be interested in such an escalation.

While principally I think that politicians need to be able to take some criticism, it was especially enlightening to hear the arguments why both ... More »

“We’re going to treat them the way we would treat an opponent”. Anita Dunn, White House. Chris Wallace [calls] the administration “the biggest bunch of ... More »

See Full Review » (8 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.7
by Steven K Samra - Oct. 13, 2009

Stelter struggles to maintain an air of objectivity in the piece and in doing so, seems to lose sight of the larger issues being put forth about the network by the Obama administration. Simply because a television program has large numbers viewers does not make that program somehow more relevant, accurate or fair. Stelter would have increased his competency on the piece by presenting additional examples of why the Obama administration has reached the conclusions about Fox news ... More »

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.2
by Jim Lang - Oct. 13, 2009

Report on a feud without much meat or context.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Silhouette_sml
5.0
by alan segal - Oct. 13, 2009

This is a topic of great concern for millions of people, and a threat to our consensus Democracy ,how the public airwaves can be used as an attack and propaganda arm of the Republican Party and be paid for by supposedly politically neutral national advertisers.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.2
by Patrick McGuire - Oct. 13, 2009

It is a story that needs to be told but I left wondering why the Obama administration even pays lip service to Fox?

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.5

Good
from 5 reviews (56% confidence)
Quality
3.4
Facts
3.8
Fairness
4.3
Sourcing
3.5
Style
3.3
Context
3.0
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
2.7
Relevance
4.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.7
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
2.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!