Scholars for 9-11 Truth & Justice Misrepresented in Draft Bill Sent to 8 House Members

stj911.org by Victoria Ashley | Oct. 23, 2008 (Press Release)

Berkeley, CA, October 22, 2008 -- On October 18, 2008, an OpEdNews article titled, "8 House Members View Draft Bill on Independent Science/Tech Probe of WTC 1, 2, 7 Collapses," was published by four members of the group Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice (STJ911.org). The authors of the article and draft bill are not spokespersons for Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice, and therefore are individually responsible for it.

Scholars for 9/11 Truth & ... Full Story »

Posted by Erik Larson

See All Reviews »

View | |

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Review

Silhouette_sml
4.3
 by Erik Larson - Oct. 23, 2008

it's not "journalism" per se, as it's a press release; imho, it's a good use of the new media to respond to misinformation and misrepresentation

this is a blog post i wrote in response to these events: Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice Rejects Association with Directed Energy Weapons and Mini-Nukes in Draft Bill http://911reports.wordpress.com/2008/10/23/scholars-for-911-truth-justice-rejects-association-with-directed-energy-weapons-and-mini-nukes-in-draft-bill/

“asking Congress to investigate many poorly defined, and highly implausible hypotheses minimizes the chances that Congress would be willing or able to investigate the actual evidence for the demolition of three WTC buildings.” – Kevin Ryan on the Ellis press release and draft bill

i agree; misinformation distracts and discredits, it will not be useful in a new 9/11 investigation, and it does not help make the case for a new investigation.

Erik posted this story.
(8 answers)

Erik's Rating

Overall
4.3

Good
from 8 answers
Quality
4.1
Insight
5.0
Style
4.0
Context
3.0
Popularity
5.0
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
5.0
More How our ratings work »