Not a very original work of journalism, IMHO. It primarily reports on Edward's appearance on Hardball, without any additional sourcing or factual evidence, and very little context.

No real reporting or insight- just a report on an appearance of Edwards on MSNBC.

The story is well written and mostly an accurate presentation of the highlights of an interview that was on "Hardball" the previous night. The reporter does get one minor fact wrong: though Edwards did very well on the world leaders quiz that Chris Matthews gave him, he was not able to identify the leader of South Africa.

As a Gephart supporter in New Hampshire I shifted to John Edward's after Iowa. THis was a fun piece for me to read as I truly admire the Edward's family and their struggles. I like my politicians to have had their souls kicked around a little bit. This story made me want to read what else this reporter will say about each of the candidates. A puff piece but fun.

This is good journalism for several reasons. First, it does not praise or condemn, only report in a complete way. Second, it is about a topic of great interest to most people that might not otherwise be reported because of the hype with Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Balanced, factual, fair, current and interesting to a large number of people nationally.

I think the questions were fair and the subject answered them. The reporter seemed to be factual.