Al-Qa'ida-linked website backs McCain as president

The message, posted on Monday on the password-protected al-Hesbah website, said if al-Qa'ida wants to exhaust the United States militarily and economically, "impetuous" Republican presidential candidate Senator John McCain is the better choice because he is more likely to continue the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Full Story »

Posted by Chris Finnie
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Chris Finnie - Oct 22, 2008 - 8:13 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Chris Finnie - Oct 22, 2008 - 8:13 AM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
4.6
by Chris Finnie - Oct. 22, 2008

While we heard a lot in 2004 about Al-Quida's preference for John Kerry, I doubt this will get much play in U.S. media outlets--even though it's an AP story. Whoever posted it is a good student of history. The collapse of the USSR is widely attributed to the financial woes caused by the arms race. In our current economic straits, it would not take much to push the US into bankruptcy either.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Silhouette_sml
2.2
by Rachel Alger - Oct. 22, 2008

Very short and I don't really see why it has even been written.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.6
by Evan Langhorst - Oct. 22, 2008
See Full Review » (5 answers)
Silhouette_sml
1.0
by Elizabeth Basso - Oct. 22, 2008

No, it is not quality journalism. The web-site this article was posted is not available to the public. It is secured by an unknown password. There is no validity to the story. Haafid is 'not believed to have a direct affiliation with al-Qa'ida' and therefore, this story is not plausible.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.3
by Melissa Drobysh - Oct. 22, 2008
See Full Review » (5 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.3
by Ashley Graves - Oct. 22, 2008
See Full Review » (10 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.2

Average
from 6 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.2
Facts
3.0
Fairness
3.3
Information
3.5
Sourcing
2.7
Style
2.7
Context
3.3
Depth
2.0
Enterprise
2.7
Popularity
3.0
Recommendation
3.2
Credibility
2.8
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!