Spinning a Web of Lies at Digital Speed

Experimental sites like newstrust.net hope to create ratings systems from authorities who evaluate news articles on a range of criteria, and are themselves rated by the raters. (One of my articles was vetted by four reviewers and received a 4 out of 5 in terms of accuracy from its four reviewers.)

Fabrice Florin, the founder of News Trust, said sites like his would be crucial to flagging inaccuracy, though he said, “we probably wouldn’t be as ... Full Story »

Posted by Fabrice Florin

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

N1812091_2834_thumb
3.6
by Derek Hawkins - Oct. 13, 2008

A clever, interesting and thoughtful story on the spread of misinformation online, particularly through social news sites.

Disclosure: Derek is involved in this story as the subject (review not included in overall rating). Help
See Full Review » (11 answers)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.8
by Fabrice Florin - Oct. 13, 2008

Thoughtful analysis about the spread of misinformation over the Internet -- and how it can be involuntarily amplified by unedited news aggregators such as Digg or Google News (or voluntarily in partisan sites like the Drudge Report). The author provides good factual evidence from multiple sources to support his findings. The article also points to NewsTrust as a possible solution to this growing problem, and accurately describes how this service works. [Disclosure: I head NewsTrust, ... More »

We're very grateful to be included in this report as a newsworthy experiment to address the important issue of misinformation on the Internet. ... More »

Disclosure: Fabrice is involved in this story as the subject (review not included in overall rating). Help
See Full Review » (13 answers)
Fred_gatlin_thumb
3.8
by Fred Gatlin - Oct. 13, 2008

An interesting story regarding rumors and facts of stories placed on the Internet and their affect of false information. One sign that NewsTrust is advancing is that the author not only quotes Fabrice Florin but brags about the rating of another story that he wrote. These are small but important steps.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.3
by Michael Bugeja - Oct. 13, 2008

The issue of hoaxes, especially on Internet, is important--so much so, that I devoted a chapter to this very topic in Living Ethics Across Media Platforms To bust a hoax, reporters need to think critically; to suspect one, readers and viewers need to as well. Indeed, as Marsha Iverson, a NewsTrust reviewer, states here, it is rare that a news outlets advocates for more critical thinking. We need that in classrooms as well as news rooms. What I especially admire about this Times ... More »

I have written and warned about the effect of hoaxes for several years without much support from journalism educators. I'll provide links to some of ... More »

See Full Review » (21 answers)
Desktop_shot_a_25__thumb
4.3
by Marsha Iverson - Oct. 13, 2008

It is rare that journalists and media outlets point to information sources to exhort the public to hone their critical thinking skills. In this piece, Noam Cohen cites several critical examples of the damage done by inaccurate information--often deliberately spread by those who stand to gain from its dissemination. Journalists, news junkies, and even casual readers alike are well advised to apply stringent analytical standards and good common sense to evaluate "news," whatever the source.

As a NewsTrust reviewer/host, I take particular glee in having this project cited as an admirable source. But this is tautological--I became a ... More »

“There is almost a short-seller mentality in the blogosphere,” he said. “We allow anyone to submit on a level playing field. We allow the digital democracy to be the ... More »

Disclosure: Marsha is involved in this story as a co-worker (review not included in overall rating). Help
See Full Review » (14 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.2
by Gerard Barberi - Oct. 13, 2008

Jay Adelson advocating transparency? He may want to consider practicing some on Digg.

Jay Adelson advocating transparency? He may want to consider practicing some on Digg.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
N1545378395_3691_thumb
1.9
by Peter L. Combs - Oct. 14, 2008

The most glaring error on the Oprah rumor was that SHE did refuse to have Palin on, but she also refuse other candidates as well because she had endorsed Obama. I saw an interview with her where she explained the situation. So Factually SHE did refuse to have Pailin on her show, butr she did the same for many others as well. Half Truths..don;t fly..you might want ot have a closer look at the rest of this NYT article..

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Dscf2146_thumb
4.2
by Glenn LaBauve - Oct. 13, 2008
See Full Review » (11 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.4
by Randy Morrow - Oct. 13, 2008
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.9
by Philippe Habib - Oct. 13, 2008

Raising the alarm about how the lack of an editor's filter allows bad news into the world.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.6
by Harry A Farr - Oct. 13, 2008
See Full Review » (5 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.5
by De- Brown - Oct. 13, 2008
See Full Review » (5 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.0
by Elham Khabiri - Oct. 13, 2008
See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.8

Good
from 10 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.7
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
3.8
Insight
4.0
Sourcing
3.8
Style
4.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
3.5
Depth
3.2
Enterprise
3.2
Expertise
5.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
5.0
Transparency
4.0
Responsibility
5.0
Popularity
3.8
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
3.8
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »