'Economists For McCain' Trash McCain's New Mortgage Plan

In interviews with the Huffington Post, roughly a dozen of McCain's economist supporters said they disagreed with the Senator's recent proposal -- for the government to buy distressed mortgages at face value from banks and renegotiate them with homeowners. Several viewed it as a gimmick, driven mostly by political circumstance. Only one pro-McCain economist spoke up in favor of the plan. Full Story »

Posted by Kelly Garrett
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kelly Garrett - Oct 10, 2008 - 2:02 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kelly Garrett - Oct 10, 2008 - 2:02 PM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Biopic-portrait-sm_thumb
3.8
by Kelly Garrett - Oct. 10, 2008

Provides a sizable list of criticisms leveled by economists at McCain's economic plan. It isn't clear how representative these views are -- it's implied that these opinions are shared by most economists, but it's not clear how this was determined.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.8
by Marty Heyman - Oct. 10, 2008

As far as it goes, it brings statements from supporters unhappy with the proposal. It would have been much stronger if it had counterbalanced this with some supporters of the proposal and some willing to explain the differences in viewpoint.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
100_1249_thumb
3.9
by Samantha Neff - Oct. 23, 2008

This story cited a lot of sources, from diverse backgrounds and geographical locations, who all had unique perspectives on McCain's proposed mortgage buy-up plan, though they all seemed to have reached the same conclusions about the plans merit and potential effectiveness.

I have never read anything from this online publication, but I found this story to be one of the better criticisms of McCain's mortgage bail-out ... More »

Michael Connolly, an economics professor at the University of Miami, called the idea “Robin Hood economics.” More »

See Full Review » (8 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.8

Good
from 3 reviews (confidence not calculated)
Quality
3.8
Facts
4.0
Fairness
3.3
Information
4.3
Sourcing
4.5
Style
3.5
Context
3.5
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
3.0
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
3.0
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!