Palin’s Debate Reviews Are In

All agree she did good. But will it make a difference?

The irony is that the MSM, precisely as they had done at the GOP Convention, helped deliver a huge audience (nearly 70 million viewers) and a moral victory to Palin. Had they not savaged her and ridiculed her for weeks — just as they did after her selection as VP was announced — she would not have appeared so stunningly different and better than the image many voters had of her going into the debate. If the MSM did not exist, Palin would have to invent ... Full Story »

Posted by Roland F. Hirsch

See All Reviews »

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Review

Member_photo_thumb
2.1
by Dwight Rousu - Oct. 7, 2008

I don't agree that she did good. She did not even do well. The Republicans insisted on no followup questions, so here booboos could not be identified in real time. She avoided answering any question for which she did not have an answer and went to abusing the debate format to pitch BS to the audience. Raw and rah rah, nothing more. Rubin adds little to the discussion.

(11 answers)

Dwight's Rating

Overall
2.1

Poor
from 11 answers
Quality
2.3
Information
2.0
Insight
2.0
Style
2.0
Context
2.0
Enterprise
2.0
Expertise
2.0
Originality
3.0
Relevance
3.0
Popularity
1.5
Recommendation
2.0
Credibility
1.0
More How our ratings work »