Palin’s Debate Reviews Are In

All agree she did good. But will it make a difference?

The irony is that the MSM, precisely as they had done at the GOP Convention, helped deliver a huge audience (nearly 70 million viewers) and a moral victory to Palin. Had they not savaged her and ridiculed her for weeks — just as they did after her selection as VP was announced — she would not have appeared so stunningly different and better than the image many voters had of her going into the debate. If the MSM did not exist, Palin would have to invent ... Full Story »

Posted by Roland F. Hirsch
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Roland F. Hirsch - Oct 6, 2008 - 5:39 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: David Fox - Oct 9, 2008 - 11:55 PM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Biopic-portrait-sm_thumb
3.2
by Kelly Garrett - Oct. 7, 2008

Summarizes the positive coverage of Gov. Palin's debate performance, charges the MSM of bias in assessing the implications of her competent, expectation-defying performance, and discusses strategies available to both camps. Concludes that a Republican victory looks improbable.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Dwightskagitspring_thumb
2.1
by Dwight Rousu - Oct. 7, 2008

I don't agree that she did good. She did not even do well. The Republicans insisted on no followup questions, so here booboos could not be identified in real time. She avoided answering any question for which she did not have an answer and went to abusing the debate format to pitch BS to the audience. Raw and rah rah, nothing more. Rubin adds little to the discussion.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Silhouette_sml
2.0
by Paul Belle-Isle - Oct. 8, 2008
See Full Review » (6 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.4
by Roland F. Hirsch - Oct. 7, 2008

This may be the best summary of reactions to the VP debate yet published. It is lengthy, including both quotes from newspaper editorials and from analysts. But the author adds considerable information in her own analysis, which provides the context for the specific comments.

See Full Review » (12 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

2.9

Average
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
3.0
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
3.0
Insight
2.3
Sourcing
5.0
Style
3.2
Context
3.2
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
2.7
Expertise
2.5
Originality
2.5
Relevance
3.5
Popularity
2.4
Recommendation
2.5
Credibility
2.0
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!