The Politics of Spite

If Republicans think something might be good for the president, they’re against it — whether or not it’s good for America. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala - via Digg, Memeorandum
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Diggs: 204 (as of 2009-10-05)
Editorial Help
Posted by: via Memeorandum - Oct 5, 2009 - 6:01 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Oct 5, 2009 - 8:52 AM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.8
by Fabrice Florin - Oct. 6, 2009

A voice of reason in our highly polarized media world. Krugman provides thoughtful commentary about a disturbing trend in ruthless tactics used by Republicans to discredit their opponents. He makes some really good points, backed by factual evidence, with useful context about this disturbing development.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.2
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 5, 2009

Lacks nuance. There's many different Republicans saying different things. It's unfair to clump them all together, and only serves to make this sound like a partisan attack, rather than political analysis. I did appeciate the SS analogy, however.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
N1291308116_4139_thumb
3.6
by Vincent Caminiti - Oct. 5, 2009

It's no secret that I like Krugman's opinion columns, whether I agree with him or not. In this case - this is only the opinion section because he's Op-Ed writer - this is essentially a factual report showing more courage than that of what's permitted in the "business" of "News." He actually reported nothing but facts. Simple, effective writing, presentation of facts and a framing based on the writers pedigree converts it into Opinion - a safe place for the NYT not to offend an advertiser.

This didn't require a lot of research. The fact is - it seemed more important to Krugman to not make a tacit recommendation of Democrats simply ... More »

See Full Review » (19 answers)
Lrwsd_thumb
4.7
by Lynn R. Willis - Oct. 5, 2009

This well written opinion piece adds to the growing mountain of criticism of the asinine and immature hissy fit that has characterized the Republicans' (in Congress and elsewhere) response to the election of President Obama and his efforts to accomplish some goals that will help all of us.

Here's hoping that the 2010 elections send most of these ideologues and jackasses back to wherever they came from...

See Full Review » (19 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.4
by Dwight Rousu - Oct. 5, 2009

Krugman capsulizes a characterization of the tone and main theme of the radical right who constitute all that is left of the Republican party politic.

The key point is that ever since the Reagan years, the Republican Party has been dominated by radicals — ideologues and/or apparatchiks who, at a fundamental level, do ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
101_0313_thumb
4.6
by Jo Bobenhouse Smith - Oct. 5, 2009

Behavioral/sociological insight from Paul Krugman is always a double-sided interest for me. How otherwise would I find three words "paeans, puerile & brats" in one article.

See Full Review » (5 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.4
by Randy Morrow - Oct. 6, 2009

Dr. Krugman comments on what he thinks the repugs have become.

The right cheers losing the Olympic bid (and the jobs). Why do they hate America? Why do they want us to fail?

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Copy_of_tab_december_2005_001_thumb
1.6
by Gordon Townsend - Oct. 5, 2009

While I believe Krugman is correct in his thesis he is over broad in his application. Obama has done nothing but reenforce a negative image. From ... More »

See Full Review » (4 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.3
by margaret draper - Oct. 5, 2009

It is quality opinion. Mr. Krugman takes a strong stance but he backs it up with historical events and his perceptions of controversies in the past.

See Full Review » (4 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.8
by Phil Diamond - Oct. 6, 2009
See Full Review » (5 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.8

Good
from 6 reviews (47% confidence)
Quality
3.8
Facts
4.5
Fairness
4.5
Information
3.2
Insight
4.3
Style
4.4
Accuracy
4.5
Balance
4.0
Context
4.2
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
2.2
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.5
Transparency
2.5
Responsibility
4.3
Popularity
3.8
Recommendation
3.8
Credibility
4.3
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!