Excellent overview of some misleading statements by both presidential candidates this year, by the always reliable FactCheck.org. Political ads and campaign distortions are expertly compared to factual evidence, and fairly debunked with multiple sources, from across party lines.

FactCheck continuing to do its unbiased objective job. While many of these "whoppers" are pointed out elsewhere in the press, the correction is often buried in stories that emphasize the claim. FactCheck lays out the facts simply and concisely.

Fair and factual. A compendium, this does not document sources directly but has about 40 links to the source FactCheck articles and others. In keeping with the FactCheck mission, it presents the facts without keeping a score sheet on the candidates. A tour de force of truth, this gives the big picture that everyone should see.

This is what voters need: an unbiased look at the FACTS. FactCheck is a model of neutrality and calm in a heated, fast-paced, emotional period of news reporting. While it might be fun occasionally to ride the roller coaster of rumor, scandal and innuendo dished out daily by various news sources (and the candidates' camps), is this what news reporting should be about? There is so much info-tainment and distraction out there; however, only knowing the straight facts will assist an ... More »

This is a fair and balanced look at the typical misinterpretation, misdirection and outright deception always evident in today's American political landscape.

This story is quality journalism because it is well-sourced, fairly balanced (at least along a political spectrum) and has been well-researched and is not a knee-jerk reaction story relying on speed of posting rather than presenting quality information in a timely manner.