Advocates Fight Mountaintop Removal

Environmental groups across the southeast United States, from Georgia to the Appalachia region, are stepping up their opposition to a controversial but widespread practice by coal companies of removing the tops of mountains with explosives. Full Story »

Posted by Patricia Blochowiak
Tags Help
Subjects: Business
Topics: Coal
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Patricia Blochowiak - Oct 2, 2009 - 8:34 PM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Patricia Blochowiak - Oct 2, 2009 - 8:35 PM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Silhouette_sml
4.7
by Anna Carter - Oct. 5, 2009

It reports the facts of an issue which is vitally important, but not well reported.

I have been distressed for so many years, seeing this desecration of a beautiful land, and finding that the government cared more about the greed ... More »

See Full Review » (5 answers)
N1268743943_3841_thumb
3.8
by Judy Plapinger - Oct. 5, 2009

Mountaintop Mining is one of the truly bizarre practices that go on in this country. There is a chance that the Obama Administration and the ... More »

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.2
by Doris Kirkpatrick - Oct. 3, 2009

This issue is important for the whole nation but especially to those of us in the Southeast. The blasting fills up the streams and destroys old, growth forests, creates erosion and eyesores. The article explains further the destruction it causes. The Great Smokey Mountains are the most visited of all National Parks.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.4
by Theresa Dark - Oct. 4, 2009

The article is clear, concise, and well written. The journalist, Matthew Cardinale is biased in his view, but for a good reason he is trying to wake up those of us not paying attention to the destruction of our earth. I did some checking and they do indeed blow off the tops of mountains for very little coal. Hopefully the new administration will put a stop to this type of procedure.

See Full Review » (18 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.2

Good
from 4 reviews (26% confidence)
Quality
4.1
Facts
4.5
Fairness
4.0
Information
5.0
Insight
5.0
Sourcing
3.3
Style
5.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
3.0
Context
4.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
4.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
5.0
Transparency
4.0
Responsibility
5.0
Popularity
4.4
Recommendation
4.8
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!