Sweet promises and the sour taste of fiscal reality

Boston Globe - by Derrick Z. Jackson - Sep. 16, 2008 (Opinion)
With federal support for domestic programs run into the ground by Bush, it seems implausible that Obama can right the fiscal ship by taxing only corporations and the top 5 percent of Americans. His pledge is not as bizarre as Bush urging Americans to display post-9/11 patriotism by getting on planes to Disney World, but it does steer into the arena of illusion, that all will be well with 95 percent of the people not called to sacrifice.

To be ... More »
Review | Like | Submitted by Naomi Isler
Featured Reviews
Member_photo_thumb
3.7
by Kaizar Campwala - Sep. 16, 2008 - See Full Review (12 answers)
Notes: A well-balanced read pointing out potential problems with Obama's fiscal plan.

More Reviews
Silhoutte_sml
3.5
by Naomi Isler - Sep. 16, 2008 - See Full Review (1 answer)
Naomi submitted this story.

Normheadshottight_thumb
1.0
by Norman Rogers - Sep. 17, 2008 - See Full Review (7 answers)
Notes: Since Bush has increased spending by 25% in 7 years how can it be that support for domestic programs is run into the ground? Obviously Obama's program is cynical class warfare and to take it seriously is to participate in the lie. Also, Obama wants to reduce the corporate tax, not increase it. This author hasn't the slightest clue.

Tags Help
Topics Politics, Business, U.S. | Democratic Party, Obama Administration, Taxes, U.S. Budget, U.S. Economy
Research Help
Search Sites Google | Yahoo | Technorati | Wikipedia | del.icio.us
Stats Help
Editorial Help
Submitted by Submitted by Naomi Isler - Sep 16, 2008 - 4:10 PM PDT
Reviewed by Naomi Isler (review), Kaizar Campwala (review), Norman Rogers (review)
Edited by Kaizar Campwala - Sep 16, 2008 - 4:32 PM PDT
No quotes yet. Please review this story to add some!
No comments yet. Please review this story to add yours!
Tools

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:


(Beta) Ratings
Our Rating
3.1
(good)
3 reviews

Quality
2.9

Balance
4.0

Context
1.5

Facts
4.0

Fairness
2.5

Information
2.5

Sourcing
3.0

Style
4.0

Popularity
3.8

Recommendation
3.3

Credibility
3.0

# Reviews
1.5

# Views
2.6

# Likes
1.0

# Emails
1.0


How our ratings work