McCain's Court: Change We Don't Need

If McCain is elected, change would clearly be coming to the U.S. Supreme Court. And in constitutional law, the Republican presidential nominee is anything but conservative. Once skeptical of the idea that the court should overrule Roe v. Wade, he now invokes the clichés and code words of the extreme right. His votes have matched his words, for he has been a proud and enthusiastic supporter of President George W. Bush's most extreme appointees to the ... Full Story »

Posted by Patricia Blochowiak
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Patricia Blochowiak - Sep 13, 2008 - 10:26 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Silhouette_sml
3.8
by Jeanne Roberts - Sep. 14, 2008

President elect John McCain is convincingly portrayed as the one man who could, through the appointment of a lifelong seat (or seats) on the Supreme Court, put the court so far to the right that any social or environmental progress made since the 60s (Clean Air, Clean Water, Endangered Species, citizen access to federal courts, sex discrimination) will be abrogated. McCain's touted "strict construction and restraint" legal policies are in fact code for far-right judicial leanings, ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
5.0
by Mandy Brown - Sep. 14, 2008

McCain/Palin will destroy the constitution, our national treasure.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
P9110066_thumb
4.0
by Patricia Blochowiak - Sep. 13, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Silhouette_sml
1.0
by Roland F. Hirsch - Sep. 15, 2008

This opinion piece has minimal journalistic merit. It is an attack on McCain without any evidence. The author is so ignorant that he does not even know that McCain is one of the "Gang of 14", which defines the absolute center of the spectrum on court appointments. Obama is well known as among the most extreme left Senators on his voting record. Will perhaps please far-left ideologues, but ideology does not make for journalism.

See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.3

Average
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
3.3
Facts
1.0
Fairness
3.3
Information
3.3
Sourcing
3.0
Style
1.0
Accuracy
1.0
Balance
1.0
Context
3.3
Popularity
3.3
Recommendation
3.5
Credibility
3.0
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
3.4
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!