The Perilous Price of Oil

The public is asking for an answer to two questions. The principal question is whether the sharp oil price increase is a speculative bubble or simply reflects fundamental factors such as rapidly rising demand from developing nations and an increasingly limited supply, caused by the dwindling availability of easily extractable oil reserves. The second question is related to the first. If the oil price increase is at least partly a result of speculation, ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Subjects: Business, U.S.
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Sep 8, 2008 - 9:13 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
4.0
by Chris Finnie - Sep. 8, 2008

I'm no economist. So I'm always grateful when somebody who is more expert than I am can explain economic forces in a way that makes sense. Soros has done that. Of course, any economic theory is just that--a theory--unless you can produce lots of evidence that it works. While he hasn't done that here, his theories have made him a wealthy man. So they're worth listening to.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.3
by Mike LaBonte - Sep. 8, 2008

Not much evidence supplied, but really interesting insights.

See Full Review » (8 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.0
by Kaizar Campwala - Sep. 8, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Betsy_taylor_photo2_thumb
4.1
by Betsy Taylor - Sep. 8, 2008
See Full Review » (12 answers)
Normheadshottight_thumb
2.5
by Norman Rogers - Sep. 9, 2008

Both the New York Review of Books and George Soros are political nut cases. Soros is a very successful speculator but why would he tell anyone much about how he makes money through speculation? Or is his testimony part of a plot to further his speculations? Certainly his comment on peak oil is right on target. There are huge, huge potential sources of oil given the right price.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.5

Average
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.5
Facts
3.0
Fairness
3.0
Information
3.8
Sourcing
2.5
Style
4.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
4.2
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
3.8
Credibility
3.3
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!