The Conservative Case for Urbanism

Republicans may have an uneasy relationship to global warming, but some are finding reasons to embrace government projects close to environmentalists' hearts -- like public transit.

Policies in favor of dense development shouldn't be viewed on a left-right spectrum and certainly needn't be filtered through culture-war rhetoric, the panelists said. In fact, one doesn't have to be concerned about climate change at all in order to support such policies; values of fiscal conservatism and localism, both key to Republican ideology, can be better realized through population-dense development than through sprawl. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

See All Reviews »

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Review

Normheadshottight_thumb
1.8
by Norman Rogers - Sep. 6, 2008

The article is dismissive of global warming skeptics many of whom are scientifically well informed with a very strong case. I live in a high rise in Chicago and use mass transit. But for most people mass transit is not a possibility without moving most of the population to dense cities. So the argument is brainless.

(7 answers)

Norman's Rating

Overall
1.8

Poor
from 7 answers
Quality
1.7
Fairness
2.0
Information
2.0
Sourcing
2.0
Context
1.0
Popularity
2.5
Recommendation
2.0
Credibility
3.0
More How our ratings work »