Awfully wordy for a relatively simple and not-so-novel point -- sanctions will backfire; careful rapprochement is the most effective long-term solution. The case is well made and reasonable, but I question the analogy to Nixon and China in the 70s. Iran is comparatively small potatoes.

I can't say I agree with this op-ed, but the author's positions are presented well. I'm just not sure it's fair to compare Iran today with China of the early seventies.

This article reminds me of Judith Miller's crafting of reality before the Iraq invasion. The authors seem to accept without equivocation that Iran is lying and is bent on deceiving the world in its mad rush to build a nuclear weapon. They also have decided that, per their lead paragraph, "TEHRAN’S disclosure...has derailed the Obama administration’s already faltering efforts to engage with Iran." That's the gist of their article. Their crumb of peace at the end is that if ... More »

This is a frank and sincere article which sees the U.S. - Iranian relations in an open-minded and productive way. The dismissal of any talk of some "axis of evil" as well as the dismissal of any corresponding concept in today's leading politicians' minds brings a refreshing new way of thinking which seems to be quite promising.

OPustanding policy recommendation from the Leveretts, who are among the very best Iran (and Middle East) analysts. Thge authors make a good case for seeking US friendship with Iran (something Iran has sought). They don't mention the fact Israel vetoed a deal between Iran and the US that would have restored diplomatic relations, with Iran agreeing to accept Israel within its June 1, 1967 borders.

It gives a less hysterical view than the leaders of UK, USA, and France.Politicians first actioon is over reaction.