Who Do You Want Running the West Wing?

A recent NYT article has detailed the dysfunction of the McCain campaign, in what the authors referred to as a "loose style" of "infighting" and "colliding centers of power," providing a picture of a McCain campaign divided by competing interests and unclear leadership. Full Story »

Posted by Martin Muse
Tags Help
Subjects: Politics, U.S.
Member Tags: competency, campaign staff
Stats Help
Number sourcesHelp: 3
Anonymous sourcesHelp: 0
Number viewpointsHelp: 2
Opinions as factsHelp: 0
Derogatory wordsHelp: 0
Complimentary wordsHelp: 0
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Martin Muse - Aug 19, 2008 - 12:37 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Aug 19, 2008 - 5:11 AM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
2.7
by Kaizar Campwala - Aug. 19, 2008

This article would have been far more successful if there was a historical comparison between how past campaigns were run and the subsequent 'competency' of the administrations. Without this evidence, there's not much here.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.0
by George Larson - Aug. 19, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)
N1812091_2834_thumb
2.6
by Derek Hawkins - Aug. 19, 2008
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Silhouette_sml
5.0
by Martin Muse - Aug. 19, 2008

This article covers an important subject not covered elsewhere - the question of competency as evidenced by the two campaigns. Given that the campaign staff and management style are indicators of how the West Wing would be run, which candidate would bring more competency to the next administration? Highly recommended article.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

2.8

Average
from 4 reviews (confidence not calculated)
Quality
2.9
Facts
2.0
Fairness
3.3
Information
3.7
Sourcing
4.5
Style
3.0
Accuracy
3.0
Balance
2.0
Context
3.3
Popularity
2.6
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
3.7
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
1.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »