Profiling's enabler: High court ruling underpins Arizona immigration law
Supporters and opponents of S.B. 1070 assume that racial profiling is unconstitutional, largely because many Americans believe that it ought to be. In fact, the U.S. Supreme Court has approved the racial profiling permitted -- indeed encouraged -- by S.B. 1070. Full Story »
Posted by Elishia Windfohr - via NewsRack (U.S.), Google News (Immigration), Moises Figueroa (f)
So the resonating question is, if Arizona's law is unconstitutional, then how come they have not sent ICE and federal Marshals with a writ to crush the policies implemented in San Francisco and California as Sanctuary Cities? If this is not a brazen violation of Federal immigration law, then what is? Doesn't it say that aiding and abetting illegal aliens imposes heavy fines and imprisonment?