Experts Rate Wikipedia's Accuracy Higher Than Non-experts

A new salvo has been fired in the perennial war over Wikipedia's accuracy. Thomas Chesney, a Lecturer in Information Systems at the Nottingham University Business School, published the results of his own Wikipedia study in the most recent edition of the online journal First Monday, and he came up with a surprising conclusion. Full Story »

Posted by Fabrice Florin
Tags Help
Subjects: Sci/Tech, Media, Business
Topics: Internet, New Media
Member Tags: wikipedia accuracy, accuracy study
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Fabrice Florin - Nov 28, 2006 - 4:09 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: David Fox - Dec 1, 2006 - 5:19 PM PST

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
3.5
by Warren Keith Wright - Dec. 4, 2006

Not only does Anderson link us to Chesney’s study---presented with precis and the full text---but also hooks us up with the much-debated comparison in “Nature” between Wikipedia and Encyclopedia Britannica, and the latter’s riposte. I do not find Chesney’s results perplexing; and offer two examples to explain why. Wikipedia’s article on the late (and controversial) operatic soprano Elisabeth Schwarzkopf is gracefully, expertly, and candidly written, analyzing not only her ... More »

See Full Review » (9 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.3
by Veronica Barlee - Nov. 28, 2006
See Full Review » (5 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.6
by Paul-André Raymond - Jan. 18, 2007

Short, to the point and with sound references.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.5
by Fabrice Florin - Nov. 28, 2006
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Silhouette_sml
4.5
by Tom Edwards - Dec. 3, 2006

Links directly to the paper, includes background information and opposing views, and explains the selected findings. It's just a shame that it can only end on such a wobble.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.4
by Bryan Walthall - Nov. 28, 2006

I liked this article because it linked directly to the main subject's white paper.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.0
by Neil Paterson - Dec. 1, 2006
See Full Review » (1 answer)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

Good
from 7 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.1
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.5
Information
4.0
Sourcing
4.4
Style
4.5
Balance
5.0
Context
4.0
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
3.7
Credibility
3.0
# Reviews
3.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!