Russia Agrees to Halt War

Drubbing of Georgia Deals a Blow to U.S. Foreign Policy

"A lot of this has caught the Americans by surprise," says Sabine Freizer, director of the Europe Program at the International Crisis Group in Brussels. "Politicians have been on the project of supporting democracy in the former Soviet Union without thinking of the impact in Russia. Now we're seeing a reaction." Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Subjects: World, U.S., Business
Member Tags: Ossetia, Abkhazia
Stats Help
Number viewpointsHelp: 4
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Aug 13, 2008 - 8:17 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Silhouette_sml
2.1
by James Canning - Aug. 13, 2008

This piece is one of the most deceptive I have seen, for coverage of the disaster in Georgia. Russia did not attack Georgia in order to discourage construction of further oil (or gas) pipelines. The Bush administration's foolish effort to build a useless ABM system in the Czech Republic and Poland was anything but a "high priority" apart from the neocons and the armaments manufacturers that would be involved (including their lobbyists and lawyers, etc.). Russia had made it more ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
4.0
by Fabrice Florin - Aug. 13, 2008

Excellent report on the cease-fire between Russia and Georgia, with good factual evidence from multiple sources. I'm particularly impressed by the helpful context and analysis provided in the article, which is unusual for this type of breaking news report. The reporters present not only the facts on the ground, but also the deeper implications for both U.S. and European foreign policy. Great teamwork from the Wall Street Journal, who managed to both inform us and enlighten us in a ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.0
by Kaizar Campwala - Aug. 13, 2008

Hitting on key issues of NATO expansion, Oil and Gas access, and Bush's "freedom agenda", this piece does a good job of showing the breadth of impact this recent conflict could have.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Newstrustsnapshot_thumb
4.4
by Tony Litwinko - Aug. 13, 2008

The problem is that the reporters NEVER deal with the questions of who actually started the conflict. Most sources have indicated that Georgia itself started the hostilities against South Ossetia that prompted the Russians to carry out their military action. The lack of attention to this basic question, there fore, calls into question the objectivity of the WSJ--which is usually more thorough in its reporting--and therefore suggests a Western/American bias to the otherwise thorough ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.4
by Walter Cox - Aug. 13, 2008

A very comprehensive overview that covers both the geopolitical and economic aspects of the crisis. Amazing that Russia has so quickly achieved a major shift, which is already affecting the expansion of NATO, the construction of new oil and gas pipelines through Georgia, and global perceptions of Russian strength in general. Clearly Saakashvili overplayed his hand, and by extension so did the United States; realizing this, Russia acted quickly to press its advantage. The opening ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.2
by Ari Hakkarainen - Aug. 14, 2008
See Full Review » (6 answers)
N1812091_2834_thumb
4.1
by Derek Hawkins - Aug. 13, 2008
See Full Review » (12 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.8

Good
from 7 reviews (confidence not calculated)
Quality
3.8
Facts
3.2
Fairness
3.3
Information
4.1
Sourcing
3.9
Style
4.0
Accuracy
2.5
Balance
3.0
Context
3.7
Popularity
3.7
Recommendation
3.9
Credibility
3.7
# Reviews
3.5
# Views
1.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!