World Seeks a Label to Define the Beijing Games

Smog, New Power, Architecture Cited As Key Story Lines

For many, these Olympics are a Rorschach test for how one feels about a big, complicated and hard-to-pigeonhole developing country holding a major international event. Human-rights groups have tried to dub the Games the "Genocide Games" for Beijing's support of Sudan and that African government's alleged crimes in Darfur. Others have called them the "Smog Games" for the city's dreadful air pollution. Still others predict this will be the Games when China ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

See All Reviews »

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Review

Member_photo_thumb
2.9
by Seabury Lyon - Aug. 10, 2008

This and other coverage doesn't capture my reaction to the opening ceremonies. I began in amazement, progressed to mild irritation, and ended with a TV OFF in a disgusted huff after two-plus hours. The mix of gargantuan production far too frequently punctuated by commercials grew to be an extremely tiring and irritating mess. It's taken me a couple of days to figure out the reasons for my reaction and with some reluctance I'll offer them. Whatever their intentions, organizers and corporate entities managed to produce little more than an astounding example of politics and commercialism gone wild. Could anyone honestly argue that this was the epitome of taste and human values? -that bigger and more is always better? What *positive* human values were demonstrated or served to advantage over what could have been accomplished with a more tastefully designed and scaled production? Where can such shows possibly go from here? I shudder to think. I've tried to watch events since opening night but relentless drip-drip-drips of commercial torture causes an intolerable negative reaction and TV goes off. But I suppose that's just me.

(7 answers)

Seabury's Rating

Overall
2.9

Average
from 7 answers
Quality
2.7
Fairness
3.0
Information
3.0
Sourcing
3.0
Context
2.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
5.0
More How our ratings work »