The Democrats and National Security

Since the Vietnam War the Republican Party has developed a reputation for having a superior approach to national security. Americans have long trusted the views of Democrats on the environment, the economy, education, and health care, but national security is the one matter about which Republicans have maintained what political scientists call "issue ownership."

Partly, this is for particular historical reasons. President Eisenhower initiated ... Full Story »

Posted by Patricia Blochowiak

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
N527928790_6322_thumb
4.0
by Pam Rasmussen - Aug. 5, 2008

Although Samantha Power is a bit too "trigger-happy" for my taste when it comes to when military intervention is warranted, and then slow to say we'd do better to get out (based on her other writings and comments), this is a very thoughtful response to the stubborn mindset that seems to grip the uninformed -- that the Republican philosophy actually makes us safer.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.1
by Jim Lang - Aug. 7, 2008

This is an opinion piece which discusses two books but in actuality argues for a national security policy drawn from positions of Democrats, party principles and courage to confront the hard questions of the world as it is. It is certainly not unbiased but it presents a persuasive case.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Fred_gatlin_thumb
4.0
by Fred Gatlin - Aug. 4, 2008

This is a very long and interesting review of national security in the last 40 years . It appears that both Republicans and Democrats have not provided good security, but the Republicans have more favorable positions. Now after the almost eight years of the Bush Administration, the Democrats may be able to provide national security. We can only hope someone does.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.0
by Walter Cox - Aug. 5, 2008

More a treatise on national security than a consideration of the two books in question, this review by Samantha Power provides a broad overview of national security issues that is worth reading. Never having been invaded or attacked broadside (Pearl Harbor and 9/11 notwithstanding), Americans seem not to appreciate national security in the way that most other nations do--just ask the Russians, the Chinese, or even the French, and they will respond that national security means not ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Jack_dinkmeyer_thumb
4.4
by Jack Dinkmeyer - Aug. 4, 2008

Great article, if somewhat slow going. There is a huge myth loose in the land. Namely that Americans can be made secure against bad people who want to destroy us. The 9/11 attack succeeded all too well; it terrorized Americans, who remain so today thanks to the continuing scare tactics from our government. After 9/11, everyone wanted Bush to go out and kill something, which he did, even expanding it into Iraq. But properly armed, one person—silently, unobtrusively, with no danger of ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.6
by Kaizar Campwala - Aug. 4, 2008
See Full Review » (11 answers)
P9110066_thumb
4.1
by Patricia Blochowiak - Aug. 3, 2008
See Full Review » (12 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.9
by Randy Morrow - Aug. 3, 2008
See Full Review » (11 answers)
N628474479_7734_thumb
4.0
by Joel Kulenkamp - Aug. 4, 2008
See Full Review » (6 answers)
Silhouette_sml
1.0
by John Orvis - Aug. 4, 2008

If you can make any sense of this piece, you ought to get your head examined. Her big point is that Republicans have bungled national security issues for the past 50 years while Democrats have done their best to pick up the pieces. She decries the Bush effort in Iraq and Afghanistan and she accuses him of "mishandling" the Israel-Palestine conflict (By mishandling she means Democrats and Republicans helping Israel destroy a future state of Palestine). War crimes from the idiot JFK, ... More »

See Full Review » (2 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.6
by James Canning - Aug. 4, 2008

This story merits careful reading and is of very high value. To me, one of the striking aspects of the American psyche is that grotesquely inflated "defense" spending is equated so often with patriotism, when it in fact is the direct opposite. Reagan doubled defense spending and continued to try to build a fantastically expensive 600 cpaital ship navy when it was clear the USSR was quickly reaching the point of collapse. Thanks in part to Dick Cheney, the dissolution of the only ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.9

Good
from 11 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.9
Facts
4.2
Fairness
3.5
Information
4.0
Sourcing
4.2
Style
4.0
Accuracy
4.7
Balance
3.6
Context
3.9
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
4.1
Credibility
4.1
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!