WPost Calls Out 'Uppity' Obama

At this pivotal moment in American history, the major U.S. news media is back to its old game of drawing sweeping character judgments about a presidential candidate based on misleading "quotes," a sickening replay of other recent elections. Full Story »

Posted by Margaret Yonco-Haines
Tags Help
Subjects: Politics, Media
Member Tags: Conyers, Dana Milbank, Chris Mathews
Stats Help
Number sourcesHelp: 5
Anonymous sourcesHelp: 0
Number viewpointsHelp: 2
Stakeholders quotedHelp: 4
Editorial Help

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
2.7
by Beth Wellington - Jul. 31, 2008

I'm in the minority here, wishing Parry had done a better job of raising an interesting point about coverage of Obama now and tying it to the treatment of Kucinich and Gore. The latter gentlemen are buried so far down and without links, making them hard to assess, unless one has read the evidence elsewhere. Why not make use of hyperlinks on a webiste? If Parry had simply attacked Milbank for taking a phrase from Obama's speech out of context as an example of its opposite and pointed ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.7
by Francis Lilly - Jul. 31, 2008

An excellent "field log" that documents "tactics" in a nearly ubiquitous "strategy" on the part of the print, cable, and mainstream media services to control the outcome of an election. Balance is difficult to evaluate since it is (in my recall of events, accurate) log of historical quotes compiled to present a case in defense of Senator Obama about foul play specifically against Sen. Obama's "character" while documenting the "tactic" as a Republican mainstay in any electoral cycle. ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Fred_gatlin_thumb
4.0
by Fred Gatlin - Jul. 31, 2008

A very good story. Unfortunately mainline journalist seem to think they must be fair and describe fair as even and that is wrong. If this article is correct Dana Milbank deserved to be fired.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.2
by Denise Clendening - Jul. 31, 2008

This is a thoughtful and insightful analysis of the deliberate media distortion of statements made by Democratic candidates. The links provided help support the analysis of the media’s misrepresentation of statements that result in the warping of the record to the point that what is reported has been the exact opposite of what was said. The media’s willingness to perpetuate the alteration is distressing. The recent WaPo deliberate distortion of Obama’s statement is to frame Obama ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Jack_dinkmeyer_thumb
4.2
by Jack Dinkmeyer - Jul. 31, 2008

A blistering article critical of Washington Post's Dana Milbank's distortion of an Obama's quote, twisting it to call him "a persumptuous nominee". Her distortion was parroted and expanded on by other media. The article finishes with an examination of how the media smeared Al Gore. At issue is the wretched practice of journalists to pick up sensational tidbits without bothering to check their validity, which used to be called research or verifying the facts, and spreading them ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.8
by Dwight Rousu - Jul. 31, 2008

Slanderous misquotes and slant in the mainstream media is documented in detail with regard to the fake stories using misquotes of Al Gore. This same type of press behavior is shown in the Washington Post and subsequent prominently featured right wing media shows regarding a recent Obama statement. Parry provides the full quote and the context to clearly show the misleading reporting and commentary.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
2.0
by Fabrice Florin - Jul. 31, 2008
See Full Review » (2 answers)
N628474479_7734_thumb
4.3
by Joel Kulenkamp - Jul. 31, 2008
See Full Review » (6 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.5
by Margaret Yonco-Haines - Jul. 30, 2008

Parry describes a pattern of behavior at the Washington Post and other so-called mainstream media, in which candidates and office holders who are not considered "Beltway insiders" are accused of being presumptuous and even delusionary - and in the case of Barack Obama, "uppity" - or else described in an unnecessarily demeaning way. These accusations are based on quotations taken out of context or even misquoted in order to make the intended point.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.0
by George Larson - Jul. 31, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Silhouette_sml
1.5
by Mel Cronin - Jul. 31, 2008

There are some good counter arguments in the article that are always important to note, especially in a presidential campaign. However, this reads more like a personal attack on Milbank rather than an informative piece on the Obama quote taken out of context.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
5.0
by Isaac Palmer - Jul. 31, 2008
See Full Review » (3 answers)
Silhouette_sml
1.0
by Sal Giorgio - Jul. 31, 2008
See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.7

Good
from 13 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.7
Facts
4.0
Fairness
3.4
Information
3.8
Sourcing
3.5
Style
4.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
3.0
Context
3.6
Popularity
3.7
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
3.4
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
2.6
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!