What seems to be missing in all these health care articles are explanations, in depth, of all the different "whys." Why do they want to maintain the doughnut hole. Even 50% of it. Why does this or that "undermine the essence of this agreement?" Why couldn't they move forward? Why do any of these folks get to have anything to do with this issue if they receive even one penney from the insurance or pharmacy industry? Why do these people seem more concerned with the feelings of drug company CEOs than they are with the health and well-being of their constituents? Why are they called politicians?