Reading the McChrystal Report

It’s not the Pentagon Papers. After all the noise and controversy, the assessment of the war in Afghanistan by General Stanley McChrystal that was leaked to the Post’s Bob Woodward turns out to be a singularly unsurprising document. Its emphasis isn’t on more troops (which is what all the discussion in Washington inevitably comes down to) but on a better approach to counterinsurgency. It’s a distillation of all the recent discoveries and ... Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins - via Google News (World)
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Tweets: 11 (as of 2009-09-23)
Editorial Help
Posted by: via Google News - Sep 23, 2009 - 8:03 PM PDT
Reviewed by: Fred Gatlin (review)
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Sep 23, 2009 - 8:07 PM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Fred_gatlin_thumb
4.0
by Fred Gatlin - Sep. 25, 2009

This article understands the McChrystal report and describes it well. This is good straight forward, unbiased journalism.

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

not enough reviews
from 1 review (17% confidence)
Quality
3.9
Information
4.0
Insight
4.0
Style
4.0
Context
4.0
Expertise
3.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
4.3
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!