Senator Obama in The Summer of Awful

Those of us who have been strapped into this dark ride -- arms and legs locked into the tram, following these crimes and scandals and unconstitutional measures for too long... we've been damaged a little. We've been round-house kicked in the throat once too often. Sometimes by members of our own party. So it makes sense when some of us express shock or disillusionment at the actions of a politician regardless of their party affiliation. Besides, there's ... Full Story »

Posted by Pam Rasmussen
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics
Topics: Presidential Election 2008, Democrats
Stats Help
Number viewpointsHelp: 1
Number stakeholdersHelp: 2
Derogatory wordsHelp: 4
Complimentary wordsHelp: 4
Editorial Help

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Terry Gamble
3.3
by Terry Gamble - Oct. 1, 2008

Worth reading, especially for those who feel concerned that Obama's compromises or nuanced views are tantamount to "sell-outs" or "flip-flops". Cesca is generally a thoughtful and self-examining blogger.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Andrew Van Camp
1.6
by Andrew Van Camp - Oct. 1, 2008

The main thrust of this article is the emotional writhing of a self confessed liberal over the recent “centrist maneuvers” of Obama. In the end, the writer’s consternation is assuaged by the unsupported rationalization that Obama will return to his liberal foundation once the election is won. Without debating the logic of this position, why should we be concerned about the reporters emotional flailing? It is likely that he is of the strain of liberal who will be wringing his hands about some irrational pessimism regardless.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Fred Gatlin
4.0
by Fred Gatlin - Oct. 1, 2008

A very good and acurate article. I keep comparing this election to the 1860 election when Abraham Lincoln won. In th election and as President he was blamed for both doing too much and not enough. Lincoln's strength was know how far and when the nation would move.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Chris Finnie
3.6
by Chris Finnie - Oct. 1, 2008

This personal viewpoint starts off slowly, but starts to raise some good points about halfway through. I've never agreed with a single politician on everything. All of them take stands on issues that do not align with mine. Liberals I know seem to have a tendency to fall in love with a candidate and convince themselves this will be the champion they have looked for. They are often disappointed--frequently because they simply did not pay attention to the actual candidate. Obama is not as liberal as the right would like you to believe or the left had hoped. I could have told you that months ago. It used to crack me up when I heard bloggers painting now-congressman Jerry McNerney as some great liberal. I knew Jerry and worked on ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Pam Rasmussen
3.9
by Pam Rasmussen - Oct. 1, 2008

I have been so discouraged with Obama lately that my will to vote for him at all has been seriously chipped away. However, these two pieces below have helped bring some perspective to me. The first is from the Huffington Post and points out that even some liberal "icons" (like Kucinich) are not "right" on all issues all the time. And the second, an editorial from the NY Times, reminds us what a McCain victory would mean. I'm still discouraged, but a little of the value of pragmatism is returning.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Jeanne Roberts
3.2
by Jeanne Roberts - Oct. 1, 2008

Good journalism, but fails to reveal the deeper issue, which is that others besides Cesca are not going to be so forgiving of what they perceive as Obama's treachery.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Stephen Pizzo
3.8
by Stephen Pizzo - Oct. 1, 2008

A lot of us Obama supporters have been going through the same "grieving" process. No sooner did he bag the nomination, it seems, than he started moving to the right. The "different kind of politician" started to look less and less different in the process. Of course I understand what he's doing. He's trying to attract the so-called "Reagan Democrats" back to the Democratic Party. I'm not sure we want them back, but Obama certainly needs them, or at least needs to deny them to John McCain. So it's swallow hard time... grin and bear it.. stiff upper lips etc. November is just around the corner.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Diane Kamp
1.7
by Diane Kamp - Oct. 1, 2008

Okay, so let me get this straight. We are supposed to forget the “finer points i.e. what Jefferson, Franklin, Adams, Rutledge, Madison, Paine, etc honed down to the essence of democracy and instead rely on somebody who just won’t embarrass us and somebody who wants to negotiate rather than dictate? How thin our sense of democracy has become. So for trying to make a silk purse out of sow's ear (rationalizing/weaseling out of his early choice), Cesca gets a C. For not having done his reporting homework in the first place, as a journalist he gets a D. Cesca should have checked out how Obama felt about these "finer points" of the core of liberalism as worked out with great personal cost by our framers. He might have discovered a ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Anthony Phillips
3.7
by Anthony Phillips - Oct. 1, 2008

It's a personal examination of conscience, but it brings up points that are worth remembering for all.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.4

Average
from 15 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.4
Facts
2.2
Fairness
3.6
Information
3.4
Sourcing
3.3
Style
2.6
Accuracy
2.8
Balance
2.4
Context
3.4
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
3.6
Credibility
3.7
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!