An Attack That Came Out of the Ether

Scholar Looks for First Link in E-Mail Chain About Obama

(A) biographical sketch of Barack Obama that has become one of the most effective -- and baseless -- Internet attacks of the 2008 presidential season. The anonymous chain e-mail makes the false claim that Obama is concealing a radical Islamic background. Full Story »

Posted by Michael Hudson
Tags Help
Subjects: Politics, Media, U.S.
Member Tags: Andy Martin, Danielle Allen, Donna Shaw, chain-mail, FreeRepublic.com, "THIS DEFINITELY WARRANTS LOOKING INTO.", smear email
Stats Help
Number sourcesHelp: 6
Anonymous sourcesHelp: 1
Number viewpointsHelp: 3
Opinions as factsHelp: 0
Number stakeholdersHelp: 5
Stakeholders quotedHelp: 5
Derogatory wordsHelp: 1
Complimentary wordsHelp: 2
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Michael Hudson - Jun 29, 2008 - 7:04 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Jul 1, 2008 - 7:25 AM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
4.5
by Beth Wellington - Jun. 30, 2008

The article relies on an interview w. the scholar who traced the development of the rumor and several others, as well as tracking down and interviewing those who helped the rumor circulate. Thanks, Michael, for submitting this and for the additional links. Actually, Martin is a lot less benign than the Post allows him to depict himself, as witness the newsmax article he wrote, which I've linked to below as well a Daily Kos post, since the Chicago Tribune article on Martin which it ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.2
by Tanya J. Maurer - Jul. 1, 2008

After reading it, you may have a better understanding of where your mis-informed relatives are getting the disinforming emails they forward to you.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.2
by Terry Gamble - Jun. 29, 2008

Fascinating story about the implication of using e-mail virally to spread lies and impugn character.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.6
by Walter Cox - Jul. 24, 2008

I appreciated this article because I have been the repeated recipient of several anti-Obama e-mails. On the face of it, these seemed to be poorly sourced polemics, and Snopes.com verified that they were total fabrications. However, when I e-mailed those who sent them (well-educated, normally well-informed relatives), informing them that the e-mails were false and requesting that they correct the record, I ran into quite a lot of resistance--one even claiming that "those Snopes people ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.2
by Dwight Rousu - Jun. 30, 2008

The article recounts Danielle Allen's investigation of the source of the organized lies about Obama that have circulated via email. The trail led to the Free Republic, a site for "conservatives" and libertarians. The detective story is interesting, and the information helps put the lies in context.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.5
by Roger Powelson - Jun. 28, 2008

This is a great piece examining how a rumour spreads through the internet. Rather than point fingers, it shows how a false story, like topsy, "just growed" on the internet. I thought this was fair and well-balanced enough that even the right wing sources he interviewed would agree that Mr. Mosk has an even-handed approach. I was especially interested in his information on the "freepers". a group I have run across before that had me puzzled as to it's origin and purpose. This article ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.5
by Fabrice Florin - Jun. 28, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Silhouette_sml
4.5
by Michael Hudson - Jun. 30, 2008

This article has made an interesting diagrammatic example of the genesis of how untrue political rumors are formed and maintained using collaborative spaces on the internet and the use of email to advance fear based misinformation to sway American voters.

See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.3

Good
from 8 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.4
Facts
4.5
Fairness
4.3
Information
4.9
Sourcing
4.6
Style
4.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
4.1
Popularity
4.2
Recommendation
4.4
Credibility
4.1
# Reviews
4.0
# Views
3.4
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »