Todd S. Purdum on Henry Paulson

Henry Paulson, then the Treasury secretary, in his office last September, the month Lehman fell and the bailout took shape. By Nigel Parry/CPi Syndication. It was February 2008, and Henry M. Paulson Jr., a prince of Wall Street turned secretary of the Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins - via Real Clear Politics
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Business, Politics
Member Tags: pm update
Stats Help
# Tweets: 70 (as of 2009-09-20)
Editorial Help
Posted by: via Real Clear Politics - Sep 20, 2009 - 2:29 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Sep 20, 2009 - 8:49 PM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
N1812091_2834_thumb
3.5
by Derek Hawkins - Sep. 20, 2009

Purdum's story on Paulson ran about a third longer than necessary, written with the all the excessive language typical of Vanity Fair. At times he overcompensates with negatives for what is obviously a favorable view of Paulson and his reporting methods were almost too transparent. But there are some insights into Paulson's character here I haven't gotten elsewhere, and his ambition for writing this piece is commendable.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.0
by Gary Clark - Sep. 22, 2009

This is a very friendly view of Hank Paulson, whose personal style and characteristics are emphasized. There is no critical examination of his account of the fiscal fiasco the Fed and Treasury abetted Wall Street in executing.

I have difficulty accepting that all those top financial wizards were "surprised at how the crisis in the subprime-mortgage market became, by the ... More »

Geithner’s name came up so frequently in Paulson’s conversation that one began to think of the pair of them—and others formed by the same Wall Street culture—as ... More »

See Full Review » (20 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.3

not enough reviews
from 2 reviews (36% confidence)
Quality
3.3
Facts
3.5
Fairness
3.0
Information
3.0
Insight
3.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
3.0
Balance
1.0
Context
3.0
Depth
3.5
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
2.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
3.0
Transparency
4.0
Responsibility
2.0
Popularity
3.2
Recommendation
3.5
Credibility
3.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!